August 14, 2002

Understanding how young people see the world around them often demands that we hear what they have to say. Adults aren’t the only ones with worthy views of news. But interviewing young people raises some of the most challenging questions faced by journalists.


Especially in breaking news situations, juveniles may not be able to recognize the ramifications of what they say to themselves or to others. Journalists should be especially careful in interviewing juveniles LIVE because such live coverage is more difficult to control and edit. Juveniles should be given greater privacy protection than adults.


The journalist must weigh the journalistic duty of “seeking truths and reporting them as fully as possible” against the need to minimize any harm that might come to a juvenile in the collection of information.


When interviewing juveniles, journalists should consider:


Journalistic purpose and quality of information



  • What is my journalistic purpose in interviewing this juvenile?
  • In what light will this person be shown? What is his/her understanding or ability to understand how viewers or listeners might perceive the interview? How mature is this juvenile? How aware is he/she of the ramifications of his/her comments?
  • What motivations does the juvenile have in cooperating with this interview?
  • How do you know that what this young person says is true? How much of what this young person says does he/she know first-hand? How able are they to put what they know into context? Do others, adults, know the same information?How can you corroborate the juvenile’s information?
  • How clearly have you identified yourself to the juvenile? Do they know they are talking to a reporter?

Minimize harm



  • What harm can you cause by asking questions or taking pictures of the juvenile even if the journalist never includes the interview or pictures in a story?
  • How would you react if you were the parent of this child? What would your concerns be and how would you want to be included in the decision about whether the child is included in a news story?
  • How can you include a parent or guardian in the decision to interview a juvenile? What effort has the journalist made to secure parental permission for the child to be included in a news story? Is it possible to have the parent/guardian present during the course of the interview? What are the parents’ motivations for allowing the child to be interviewed? Are there legal issues you should consider, such as the legal age of consent of your state?

If you conclude that parental consent is not required, at least give the child your business card so the parents can contact you if they have an objection to the interview being used.


Explore alternatives



  • What alternatives can you use instead of interviewing a child on camera?
  • What are the potential consequences of this person’s comments, short-term and long term?
  • What rules or guidelines does your news organization have about interviewing juveniles? Do those guidelines change if the juvenile is a suspect in a crime and not a victim? What protocols should your newsroom consider for live coverage that could involve juveniles?
  • How would you justify your decision to include this juvenile in your story to your newsroom, to viewers or listeners, to the juvenile’s parents?

The Golden Rule for interviewing children:


“Do unto other people’s kids as you would have them do unto your kids.” (From participants of “Children, Families, and Social Issues Seminar”-The Poynter Institute 1998)

Support high-integrity, independent journalism that serves democracy. Make a gift to Poynter today. The Poynter Institute is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, and your gift helps us make good journalism better.
Donate
Al Tompkins is one of America's most requested broadcast journalism and multimedia teachers and coaches. After nearly 30 years working as a reporter, photojournalist, producer,…
Al Tompkins

More News

Back to News