Wired.com
Righthaven’s campaign of copyright infringement lawsuits has suffered another setback after a federal judge ruled that a man didn’t violate copyright law when he posted a complete Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial to an online forum. David Kravets writes that the judge agreed that the posting of the editorial was “fair use” because there was no evidence that it harmed readership on the paper’s website. Righthaven’s case wasn’t helped by the fact that just five of the editorial’s 19 paragraphs were the author’s own opinion — not enough for the judge to consider it a “creative work.” Righthaven was seeking $150,000 in damages. || Earlier: Judge rules that Righthaven can’t sue on behalf of Review-Journal
Uncategorized
Judge: Posting of complete editorial to website forum doesn’t violate copyright law
More News
How Poynter transformed a hands-on workshop into an email course
Lessons learned from an experiment in building a new journalism project
April 24, 2024
Opinion | Journalists at Columbia are leading the coverage of their campus
The Columbia Daily Spectator has expertly documented tense protests over the Israel-Hamas war inside and outside the campus.
April 24, 2024
Q&A: Mina Kimes on her run from acclaimed sportswriter to Emmy-nominated NFL Analyst
The ESPN star explains how she got over her fears (and the trolls) to get better at discussing the sport she loves
April 24, 2024
No, Morton Salt and other table salts do not contain sand and glass
Excessive consumption of salt can cause hypertension because of the sodium it contains — not because of glass in the salt
April 24, 2024
Opinion | Everyday sexism has no place in sports journalism
The conversation around Gregg Doyel’s comments to Caitlin Clark failed to address larger, systemic issues that could lead to better journalism
April 23, 2024