November 6, 2012

Yes, today’s rather important for President Obama and Mitt Romney, as well as their families and supporters. But New York Times poll-blogger Nate Silver’s predictions have made him a target for the ire of conservatives and pundits protecting their turf as well as a sort of sex symbol for math nerds and others who insist Silver’s data-based approach represents a bright and alternate future for political reporting. “I know as a matter of practice that I’m going to have more opportunities if my prediction looks good and fewer if it doesn’t,” Silver told The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple. On this, he and his critics agree.

Previously: New York Times wants to hold Nate Silver to newsroom standards | Nate Silver: ‘A lot of news is really entertainment masquerading as news’ | Two views of journalism clash in debate over Nate Silver’s work | FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver adjusts to New York Times, 6 months after joining the newsroom

Support high-integrity, independent journalism that serves democracy. Make a gift to Poynter today. The Poynter Institute is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, and your gift helps us make good journalism better.
Donate
Andrew Beaujon reported on the media for Poynter from 2012 to 2015. He was previously arts editor at TBD.com and managing editor of Washington City…
Andrew Beaujon

More News

Back to News

Comments

Comments are closed.