CNN’s decision to remove a story about how hormones affect women’s voting decisions raises questions about unpublishing -- at CNN and on news sites in general. During a live chat, Poynter's Kelly McBride talked about the incident and addressed these questions:

  • Should CNN have unpublished the hormone story, and why?
  • What are the ethical implications of unpublishing a story?
  • What are some questions journalists can ask themselves before deciding whether to unpublish?
  • What are some good alternatives to unpublishing?
  • Is it ever OK to unpublish a story, and can you ever really "unring the bell"?

You can replay the chat here: