Headlines from our Mobile Media and Social Media blogs, plus posts about the future of news from our friends at paidContent, Mashable, Lost Remote, Nieman Journalism Lab, MediaShift’s Idea Lab, J-Lab and Reynolds Journalism Institute.

Screen Shot 2014-07-02 at 1.21.03 PM

As mobile ad revenue continues to soar, newspapers still struggle to catch the wave

Screen Shot 2014-07-02 at 1.22.19 PM

There was a double dose of good news in eMarketer’s mid-year ad forecast released today. Ad spending will grow more than 5 percent in 2014 for the first time in 10 years. And the mobile ad boom shows no sign of plateauing with 83 percent growth over 2013 expected.

Digital giants like Facebook and Google continue to dominate the category (together more than 50 percent), while newspapers and magazine struggle to offer competitive ad buys on their mobile products.

The Newspaper Association of America’s revenue report for 2013, released in April, found that mobile advertising had grown 77 percent for the year but still accounted for less than 1 percent of total revenue.  By contrast, as Facebook reported its first quarter earnings the same month, it said mobile had grown to 59 percent of its total ad revenue.

A newspaper publisher friend summarized the state of play in his industry this way — “2013 will be remembered as the year when mobile went from infinitesimal to insignificant.”

Doing better in 2014 remains a high priority for many newspapers, but more bumps in an already bumpy road are foreseeable.

The American Press Institute held a summit on mobile this spring and found that detailed personalized data is the key to sales.  That is a great strength of Google and Facebook as the digital giants continue to invest heavily to stay ahead of competitors

The creative side of effective mobile advertising is a work in progress for marketers.  The consensus seems to be that banners do not work well on smart phones and tablets and that video, GIFs and other entertainment along with location-specific messages are the better match to how customers use the devices.

The right sort of sponsored content/native advertising also fits with mobile, especially if it is the sort of thing users will share on social media.

In short, these are characteristics of the new generation of content sites like BuzzFeed (which does not take banners) but relatively unfamiliar to legacy operations which do.

Mobile news content is also in early stages of development except at the largest organizations like the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post and Boston Globe. They have put money into iterative improvement of apps that both display well on the smaller smartphone screen and are tailored to quick, on-the-move consumption.

My own hunch is that getting video right and getting stronger mobile ad performance will go hand in hand for news sites — challenging and frustratingly slow work but hardly impossible.

If the eMarketer forecast is correct, the imperative will only intensify. The research firm sees mobile advertising revenues passing the total ad revenues for newspapers this year and more than tripling them by 2018. Read more

Tools:
6 Comments
More in Digital Strategies
Bird words

How to do Twitter research on a shoestring

Twitter’s increasingly influential role in journalism has prompted an accompanying upsurge in academic research, particularly around the ways in which journalists and media organizations have integrated Twitter into their norms and practices.

With 500 million tweets a day, Twitter offers researchers a potentially deep and rich stream of social media data. However, unlike historical newspaper content, which is readily available via library microfiches or databases like Lexis Nexis, much of the historical data on Twitter (what’s called the Twitter firehose) is walled off in costly private archives.

Information may want to be free, but accessing and analyzing that information can be costly.

The Library of Congress signed a deal with Twitter in 2010 to build an on-site research archive but that system has still not been finalized. A progress update is expected this summer, but the archive, which now houses more than 170 billion tweets, poses major logistical challenges for the Library and the firehose reseller Gnip, which is delivering the data for Twitter. For example, a single search of the 21 billion tweets in the fixed 2006-10 archive was taking 24 hours just last year. Twitter acquired Gnip in April, prompting hopes that the archive may be operational in 2014-15, but even so, the archive will only be accessible on-site at the Library in Washington, D.C.

That source of reliable, inexpensive online access to the Twitter firehose has become almost a Holy Grail for journalism professors in the U.S. and Canada who I surveyed this June using a Google form.

Kathleen Culver, assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says she would like to see “portals for academics into Twitter, supported by Twitter,” and an easy user interface for research. Alf Hermida, associate professor at the University of British Columbia, agrees. Hermida, who has just published a new book on social media, says such a portal could contain “shared archives of Twitter data, best practices and approaches.”

Mike Reilley, online journalism instructor at DePaul University in Chicago says he wants something that will let him go deep. “I’m looking for that ‘super tool’ and am hoping someone at JS Knight Stanford comes up with one. An all-in-one tool – scrapes, archive, great search, everything. I’m tired of ‘tool-hopping’ to get work done,” he said.

Flawed early Twitter research tools

Early efforts such as the freemium TwapperKeeper service offered that “all-in-one” functionality, albeit with some restrictions. TwapperKeeper, which allowed users to create and download .csv files of Twitter archives, limited historical searches to 7 days earlier or 3,500 tweets (whichever came sooner). However, TwapperKeeper, which was launched in 2009, was taken over by HootSuite in 2011 and became a premium subscription product.

Some researchers then shifted to Topsy Pro, which offered trial accounts for researchers or a single annual license for $12,000, but the datasets were often incomplete.

Hermida says Topsy used its own criteria to delete tweets from the archive. “Topsy removed tweets that had been deleted from the Twitter firehose, and tweets without at least six retweets or a retweet by an influential user were removed from the search index after 30 days,” he said.

Robert Hernandez, associate professor of professional practice at USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism, says he has long suspected such archives could be flawed. “I always have an uneasy feeling that the archive – whether I get it formally or not – doesn’t feel as accurate or complete as one thinks,” he said.

‘Divide between data-rich and data-poor researchers’

A more robust historical search, such as analyzing the #Newtown tweets to examine journalists’ behavior in the hours immediately following the school massacre, would require subscription to a certified Twitter firehose service such as Gnip or DataSift.

These services can retrieve an unlimited amount of tweets from practically any time in Twitter’s history. But the resellers’ main focus is businesses seeking more data on how consumers view them. Thus, their pricing is aimed at institutions or corporations. The pricing plans for both companies are difficult to decipher (both sites ask users to submit a Web form for a quote) but a 2014 article put DataSift at about $3,000 a month with Gnip starting at $500 for each one-off search. Licensing fees cost an additional $0.10 per 1,000 tweets and are paid to Twitter. These licensing fees accounted for $32 million of Twitter’s earnings in the first half of 2013.

However, a $3,000-a-month subscription level or even a $500 search would be too expensive for most academics unless they were able to make arrangements with their institutions.

Hermida’s university uses Crimson Hexagon, which charges $5,000 a year for 50 search terms or “monitors” as part of its Social Research Grant Program. Elizabeth Breese, senior content and digital marketing strategist, said the program seeks researchers who are “a good fit… that the research is non-commercial in nature, and that the results will be made public in some way,” she said by email. The grant program provides 50 “simultaneous monitors” which can be deleted to provide for a new query, giving researchers more flexibility.

Meanwhile, a freemium Twitter scraping tool from the British company ScraperWiki could be the solution for cash-poor researchers. Users set a hashtag, keyword or user name as a search term and then let ScraperWiki monitor Twitter for all new occurrences. Like TwapperKeeper before it, ScraperWiki can only create new archives rather than search for historical data, but the drawbacks of the service are mitigated by the price.

Pricing starts at $9 a month for “Explorer” access to three datasets and tops out at $29 a month for “Data Scientist” access to 100 datasets. The main drawback, as discussed, is the lack of historical data. But the tool is incredibly robust and a well-planned project could return tens of thousands of rows of data for analysis and visualization as there is no maximum limit on tweets.

For example, using the Data Scientist package, a researcher could easily track the ongoing output from up to 100 users for a project such as a comparative analysis on a constructed week. In my own research, I used ScraperWiki to retrieve approximately 22,000 tweets tracing the social media development of the Tuam babies story in Ireland in May/June 2014.

ScraperWiki CEO Francis Irving says the scraper is easy to use. “Once you know the search term or user you want to archive you can create the dataset and let the tool run. Once you have enough tweets, you can download the data for analysis,” he said via Skype. The software can also visualize and summarize the data, saving much work for the researcher.

A similar freemium tool is Simply Measured’s RowFeeder, but the datasets are more expensive and the results are more limited than ScraperWiki’s. For example, RowFeeder’s cheapest product, which costs $35 a month, includes just three datasets for a maximum of 5,000 tweets per month.

In the absence of an archive from the Library of Congress, ScraperWiki seems a reasonable solution to the ongoing problem of how to collect and analyze meaningful Twitter data. Its relatively inexpensive pricing partially addresses the growing two tiers in academic research caused by the high cost of data analysis. As Hermida said in the survey, “Paying for access means that there could be a divide between data-rich and data-poor researchers.”

Correction: A previous version of this story misspelled Mike Reilley’s name.

Kelly Fincham, an assistant professor at Hofstra University, has been using Twitter for research since 2010. Read more

Tools:
13 Comments
More in Social Media

Latest from Our Partners

  • How Wayin Made Brazil’s Presidential Debates on Band TV More Social

    The second round runoff of the presidential election is set to take place in Brazil this Sunday, and like it did with the recent elections in India, Wayin is helping to the election more social. The social intelligence company powered the online social experience for the Brazil presidential debates that took place on Band TV Network [...]
  • Social Scoreboard: Thursday, October 23

    All three Shondaland shows took the top three spots last night according to the Nielsen Twitter ratings: “Scandal,” “How to Get Away With Murder,” and “Grey’s Anatomy,” represented for #TGIT. The CW’s “The Vampire Diaries,” and “Jimmy Kimmel” rounded out the night.  “: New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.
  • Friday Link Roundup: What the MLB Knows and Sitcoms’ Social Media Problems

    If your television and social media feeds are overflowing with Ebola panic, here are some good social television links you may have missed this week for weekend reading pleasure. 1) “Selfie” and “A to Z” have a social media problem. We’ve written about how “Selfie” breaks the fourth wall, but this Guardian piece explores how [...]
  • Jerry Seinfeld and Jim Carrey Lead the Charge in This Week’s Top 5 Viral TV Clips

    In this Friday’s installment of our partnership with 5by, the video discovery and messaging platform that curates the web’s best viral videos, we take a look at the top five videos of the week from the platform’s TV category. Veteran comedians shined this week on 5by’s TV channel, with Jerry Seinfeld gearing up for a new [...]
  • How Fans Reacted on Twitter to ‘The Simpsons’ 25th ‘Treehouse of Horrors’ Episode

    ‘The Simpsons’ fans may not be the most active on Twitter, but when they do tweet, they show that no pop culture reference gets by them. According to our analytics partner Canvs, which measures Twitter sentiment, 1,614 out of the 6,008 tweets about ‘The Simpsons’ 25th Treehouse of Horrors episode – which have aired since the [...]
  • Universal Pictures’ ‘Ouija’ Teams up with MTV’s ‘Teen Wolf’ for Integrated Marketing Campaign

    ‘Ouija’ – in theaters today – may not win any Academy Awards, but its production team has been doing a great job on the integrated marketing front. First, Kian Lawley (one of the members of YouTube sensations Our2ndLife) went missing for a few days, and now Universal Pictures has teamed up with MTV’s ‘Teen Wolf’ [...]
  • Launch and Learn: Lessons in Multimedia Training

    This post is a follow-up to the Idea Lab article “The Shape of Learning: How Media Consumers Become Media Producers,” based on experiments and observations in the TOW (Transom Online Workshop). We can improve the journalism industry by improving journalism: Create stories that consistently win hearts and minds, stir souls, engage brains. How do we produce better stories and [...]
  • Collaborating With Influencers: It’s Not as Terrifying as You Think

    This article is part of SWOT Team, a new series on Mashable that features insights from leaders in marketing, brand-building and public relations. To appreciate the power of video influencers, one needs to experience the pandemonium at Vidcon. Inside the web's premiere video event, the fan hysteria swirls around creators like Jenna Marbles, Jacks Gap [...]
  • Social Scoreboard: Wednesday, October 22

    ‘American Horror Story: Freakshow,’ ‘The 100,’ and ‘Modern Family’ took the top three spots last night according to Nielsen’s Twitter ratings. ABC’s ‘Black-ish’ and the CW’s ‘Arrow’  rounded out the ratings.  With two slots on Wednesday’s chart, The CW is showing that it can still dominate Wednesday nights. Still, it looks like ‘American Horror Story’ [...]
  • First Episode of New Series ‘Slednecks’ to Premiere Tonight Exclusively on the MTV App

    MTV has had a lot of recent success releasing shows – whether new series or season premieres – exclusively on its app a week before the linear debut. The network is able to boost app download numbers, and sometimes, rating numbers for the linear premiere. The network was most recently able to do this with [...]