Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

E-Media Tidbits

Home > E-Media Tidbits
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
A. Adam Glenn
A group weblog about the intersection of news & technology


The Dispensible Editor?
Posted by A. Adam Glenn at 10:06 AM on Sep. 17, 2007
social media
Delicious, Reddit
Social news services set agendas quite differently from mainstream news, new research shows.
A newsroom without news editors might be the dream of many a trod-upon reporter. But if that really were the case, and it was online users instead who set the news agenda, a new report from The Project for Excellence in Journalism suggests the stories they'd choose to lead the day, and the sources of news to which they'd pay attention, would put us in a very different world of news.

For the study, released last week, PEJ took a snapshot of news coverage for a week in June, then compared how news was handled on three sites with user-driven news agendas -- Digg, Del.icio.us and Reddit -- versus news agendas at 48 mainstream sites.

PEJ found that user-driven news agendas bear remarkably little similarity to those of the mainstream media -- especially in terms of story selection and their source. When mainstream media was focusing on Iraq and immigration, for instance, user-driven sites were talking about Apple's iPhone. And while mainstream media got their news from original reports or wire services, user-driven sites were pulling overwhelmingly from blogs and non-news information sites.

Read the report's findings.

Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs