Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Young Journalists Use Facebook Ads to Reach Prospective Employers
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

E-Media Tidbits

Home > E-Media Tidbits
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Rich Gordon
A group weblog about the intersection of news & technology


Was Orwell Right?
Posted by Rich Gordon at 6:26 PM on Oct. 18, 2005
Via BoingBoing: Some outstanding detective work by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (a great organization I keep saying I'm going to join, and now I will). Researchers working for the foundation have broken the code that some color printer manufacturers are using to watermark printouts so the printer that produced them can be identified, down to the serial number.

It would be interesting to know more about why the printer manufacturers are doing this, and how this information is being used by law enforcement, homeland security investigators -- or governments, perhaps including our own, that want to monitor or suppress internal dissent. (A 2004 article in PC World, written by one of my former students, Jason Tuohey, gives more background.)

The EFF notes that even in the U.S., there is no law preventing the government from gathering this kind of information or using it to track the source of printed documents -- "only the privacy policy of your printer manufacturer currently protects you (if indeed such a policy exists)." The organization points out that the FBI is routinely gathering information on organizations such as Greenpeace.

Here's EFF's list of printers that include these watermarks. This is a good reminder that while new technologies in general have made it easier for people to communicate and share information, they also allow new kinds of government or law-enforcement monitoring that can threaten our civil liberties -- or enable despotic regimes to crack down on dissent. I find this more than a little bit troubling.
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs