Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars
Home > Reporting, Writing & Editing
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, e-mail, Permalink, Share
11:08 AM  Sep. 2, 2004
Questions to Ask Before Going 'Off the Record'
By Kelly McBride (More articles by this author)

More in this series

  • Nelson Poynter, Radio Debut at 1924 Conventions
  • Questions to Ask Before Going 'Off the Record'
  • The Conceptual Scoop
  • Seeing News, Looking for Stories
  • On the Campaign Trail, Seeing Not Always Believing
  • Bloggers Cover the RNC
  • Editors Preview Plans for RNC Coverage
  • STUMP: A Politics Weblog
  • Complete Coverage
  • Convention's Radio Row Allows Republicans to Reach Out Directly to Voters
  • Hometown Angles: Regional Press Covers a (Somewhat) Different Convention
  • Somewhere, someone is talking to a reporter. And that someone may be asking the reporter to talk off the record or not for attribution. What's a reporter to do?

    Start with the story. Ask:

    • Is the story crucial to the public? Does it further equip readers and viewers to make responsible decisions in this democracy? Or is it simply a scoop? 
    • Is the information this source will provide crucial to the story? 
    • Does this source have firsthand knowledge of what he or she is describing? Can you report the nature of that knowledge to help the public judge the source's reliability? Is this source the only person with firsthand knowledge or is there someone else who could provide the same information on the record?
    • Is the source targeting an individual or group of individuals, and if so, does the source benefit? How? Who else benefits? How?
    • How would the source be harmed by publication of his or her name? Can you make that clear to the audience? Who else might be harmed?

    If, after asking and answering these questions, it is worth continuing the conversation with the source, here are some strategies to consider:

    • AnonArt
      Anne Van Wagener/Poynter
      Ask the source why he or she wants to go off the record. Although off-the-record status in Washington was originally a reporter's tool for getting the thoughts of whistleblowers and critics into the news, now it's become a tool of the powerful.
    • Warn the source that if the information is published, his name will be revealed to at least one editor back in the newsroom. Ask him if he'll come forward if you are subpoenaed, as reporters have been since Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA operative was revealed.
    • Ask the source to suggest others who can at least confirm the information he provided and possibly go on the record.
    • End every conversation on the record. Go over each piece of information. Can this be on the record? What about this?

    All this will chip away at the source's resistance to being quoted.

    Every anonymous source weakens journalism's credibility. In the end, ask yourself whether the loss of public trust is worth the public gain.


    Read More In This Series:
    Tools: Print, e-mail, Permalink, Comment On This Article, Share
    Recent Comments:
    Off the record
    Sometimes getting a story means getting to the information first and finding someone to quote second. I have developed solid sources and relationships with sources who spent hours talking to me "off the record." I've learned that the primary reason most non-political folks prefer to be off the record is...
    Becky Blanton, 11:16 AM September 22, 2004
    Read All Comments (2 comments)
    Username
    Password
    New User? Signup Now
    Poynter Careers
    More media jobs