At first, it just sounds crazy that people who cannot
afford a home need a cell phone. But read this piece from the
St.
Petersburg (Fla.) Times, and it makes more sense.
One of the hardest things for homeless/jobless people to do
is to be available if an employer wants to contact them. They have no mailbox -- but with a cell phone,
even a prepaid phone, they can be in touch.
On top of it all, as you think through this story, there are
fewer pay phones these days.
The Times' story
says:
Pinellas County
homeless advocates say they also have noticed the proliferation of cell phones
among people who can't afford a place to live. But Pinellas offers an alternative
for people who can't afford cells but need to provide a phone number to
potential employers.
It's called Community Voice Mail.
It works by providing homeless people a phone number and a way to record a message.
The numbers can't be used for outgoing calls, but people can check their
messages from any regular or pay phone.
"We're finding it very useful and we're getting more and more
people signed up for it," said Sarah Snyder, executive director of the
Pinellas County Coalition for the Homeless.
Tracey Crocker, a homeless advocate who was homeless herself
before moving to Florida and meeting her husband, said the phones
provide a sense of security. Especially for women.
Christa Eland, 47, doesn't have a cell phone but gets by with a
calling card.
"The only problem is that when I try to call my kids, I
always get the answering machine," she said. "They don't have a way
of calling me back, so I waste all my minutes talking to a machine."
Last
year, The Washington Post produced a
piece on the Community Voice Mail initiative.
A Week on Food Stamps
An
interesting story, or maybe just a political stunt, is unfolding
in Oregon. The governor and his wife will spend seven days living on the equivalent of a week's worth of food stamps, $65 for
a family of two. According to the story, he won't be the first state legislator to try this.
It could be eye opening to follow food-stamp recipients
through a month or two. How do they make ends meet? Could you live within those
means? I know plenty of journalists who are darn close to qualifying for
public assistance.
Here is a daily blog
from Reno (Nev.) News and Review reporter Kat Kerlin, who went on a "food stamp diet."
The piece includes this passage:
I've been on a diet for the past month. It's not one I expect to
sweep the nation anytime soon. It's called the Food Stamp Diet. It's not to
lose weight or improve my health -- in fact, I feel like crap, and I think I've
gained a bit. The idea is to see what it's like to live off the equivalent of
food stamps for a month.
$155 a month. $38.75 a week. About $5 a day.
That means no booze, no restaurants and some careful grocery
shopping.
But let's set something straight.
This experiment is not a realistic interpretation of food-stamp life. The $155
a month I'm using is the maximum given for one person on food stamps. To get
that amount in real life, I'd be jobless and homeless. I'm neither. I have a
well-equipped kitchen with an oven, fridge, freezer and microwave. I can store,
heat and chill anything I want. I have a car, which I can use to go to the
budget-friendly supermarkets rather than the nearest place within walking
distance that accepts food stamps. And my food-stamp life has an end in
sight -- one month. That's it. By the time you read this, I hope to be eating
sushi somewhere.
Al's Morning Multimedia
OK -- this
is something I like. USAToday.com
has built a ton of online reporter profiles with links to past work.
TV and radio stations should do this, linking to the best stories that reporters
and photojournalists produced recently. Why do we have to have the "Mt. Rushmore" photograph showing the anchors on top of
every TV Web site? Show me some of their work when you roll
over their Web site images.
Synthetic Track Produces Fast Times
As you begin thinking about Kentucky Derby-related
stories in the next few weeks, here's one you can localize with your nearest
horse racetrack. (The Derby is May
5.)
Since
Barbaro's injury and death, there has been a lot of talk in the thoroughbred
horse industry about synthetic
racetrack surfaces that would be easier on horses' legs. One question that
everyone in the horse world wondered about was whether the softer synthetic tracks would change race speeds. The answers are coming with spring race meets.
At
Keeneland in Lexington, Ky., the "under-tack" times were "freakishly
fast." The under-tack runs are not actual races, but time trials for
horses about to be offered for sale.
There is some evidence that cool or cold weather
affects the synthetic track in ways it does not affect natural surfaces.
This
is interesting partly because there were concerns that times would slow on the
Polytrack surface. California
tracks are installing the surface, too.
Jockeys and trainers at Turfway
Park in northern
Kentucky have
agreed overwhelmingly that the synthetic track installed there is safer than a traditional
dirt or sand track. In the fall 2006 race meet, there were three
catastrophic breakdowns in 4,479 race entries.
Thoroughbred
Times says:
During the 2007 winter-spring meet, seven horses had
to be euthanized due to injuries sustained on Turfway's Polytrack surface.
Turfway was the first North American track to install a synthetic surface.
No fatalities occurred last year. Fourteen horses were fatally
injured during the track's last meet run on a dirt surface -- the 2005
winter-spring meeting.
Last year, The Washington
Post did a very good piece on how race strategies may be different
on synthetic tracks.
We are always looking for your great ideas. Send Al a few sentences and hot links.
Editor's
Note: Al's Morning Meeting is a compendium of ideas, edited story
excerpts and other materials from a variety of Web sites, as well as
original concepts and analysis. When the information comes directly
from another source, it will be attributed and a link will be provided
whenever possible. The column is fact-checked, but depends upon the
accuracy and integrity of the original sources cited. Errors and
inaccuracies found will be corrected.
I am so glad you mentioned that there are journalists...