FRIDAY, MAY 16, 2008
Double Amputee Ruled Eligible for Olympics
Today, The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that double-amputee sprinter
Oscar Pistorius can try to get a place on the South African Olympic team.
The ruling overturns one from the International Association of Athletics Federations which said he could not compete with able-bodied runners.
Last year,
The New York Times asked, "Is he too disabled or too abled?"
The Times published a very useful interactive piece that shows why amputees might have an advantage in a sprint.
I suspect this story would be, as journos call it, "a talker." What do other athletes, especially athletes with disabilities, think? What other sports might this kind of ruling spread to, including professional golf where golf cart use has been an issue? I see this one as a milestone.
In a profile of Pistorius,
Time said:
When Oscar Pistorius' lower legs were amputated at age 1, few would have banked on this South African challenging world-class sprinters. At 20, when he began to close in on an Olympic-qualifying time for the 400 m, experts posited that his times were so good, he must have been getting an unfair advantage from his bladelike prosthetics. When he set his sights on the Olympic Games in Beijing, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) ruled he couldn't compete against able-bodied athletes. An IAAF-initiated study found that more energy is returned to Pistorius' upper legs from his blades than from ankles and calf muscles and that he uses less oxygen.
Pistorius, 21, is appealing, on the basis of studies with differing results. It was only recently that living with prosthetic legs was seen as a huge impediment, but he has turned this perception upside down. He's on the cusp of a paradigm shift in which disability becomes ability, disadvantage becomes advantage. Yet we mustn't lose sight of what makes an athlete great. It's too easy to credit Pistorius' success to technology. Through birth or circumstance, some are given certain gifts, but it's what one does with those gifts, the hours devoted to training, the desire to be the best, that is at the true heart of a champion.
Posted at 2:59:18 PM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143573
The Most Tech-Savvy Cities
Twelve percent of Austin adults are Digital Savvy, and they are almost twice as likely as the national average to be in this leading edge consumer segment. Las Vegas, Sacramento and San Diego are also leading Digital Savvy cities, with 10 percent of their residents having this higher level of technological orientation and adoption.
The list looks like this:
-
Austin
-
Sacramento
-
San Diego
-
Washington, D.C.
-
Seattle
-
Phoenix
-
Chicago
-
New York
-
San Francisco
Digital savvy folks are baseball lovers, they buy a lot of electronics at Costco, and they are likely to be in business for themselves. They are heavy e-mail users and online bill payers who use the Internet to get news/weather/movie listings. They frequent online radio, half of them spend at least $500 a year on online purchases, and they are heavy users of ESPN.com and NFL.com.
Posted at 2:49:39 PM
E-mail this item |
Add/View Feedback (1) |
QuickLink this item: A143549
California Supreme Court Approves Gay Marriage
Furthermore, in contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual’s capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual's sexual orientation -- like a person's race or gender -- does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights. We therefore conclude that in view of the substance and significance of the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship, the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples.
The Justices also said that just because a same-sex couple has a right to marry under the California Constitution, that does not mean gay couples
should get married. In other words, they may not like the decision, but it is the law.
The Court decided it was a matter of dignity, not legal protection, that was at issue in California, since, until now, "domestic partnerships" provide pretty much the same legal protections as marriage. The Court explained in this key passage of its decision:
One of the core elements of the right to establish an officially recognized family that is embodied in the California constitutional right to marry is a couple's right to have their family relationship accorded dignity and respect equal to that accorded other officially recognized families, and assigning a different designation for the family relationship of same-sex couples while reserving the historic designation of "marriage" exclusively for opposite-sex couples poses at least a serious risk of denying the family relationship of same-sex couples such equal dignity and respect. We therefore conclude that although the provisions of the current domestic partnership legislation afford same-sex couples most of the substantive elements embodied in the constitutional right to marry, the current California statutes nonetheless must be viewed as potentially impinging upon a same-sex couple's constitutional right to marry under the California Constitution.
Click here for a rundown on same-sex marriage history and a summary of what state laws are nationwide.
Here is some background on this case from the Judicial Council of California, including a link to the opinion, briefs filed before the Court in this matter, and more:
Opinion (PDF) - May 15, 2008
Oral Arguments - March 4, 2008
Audio and video archives of the broadcast are available on the Supreme Court Broadcasts page.
News Releases
Case Documents
Briefs filed in the case, organized by lead party.
Case Information
Docket, disposition, parties and attorneys, and lower court information.
Overview of the Supreme Court
Background on the high court and its justices, case information, opinions, and forthcoming filings.
Posted at 3:10:05 AM
E-mail this item |
Add/View Feedback (3) |
QuickLink this item: A143510
Open Windows Create Dangers
The Consumer Product Safety Commission is warning that as spring weather encourages you to open your windows, that can be a safety hazard, especially for kids.
The CPSC said:
"CPSC staff is aware of at least 18 falls from windows through media reports, including two deaths, involving small children since April," said CPSC Acting Chairman Nancy Nord. "We are issuing this warning so parents will take the necessary steps to prevent these incidents from happening."
These deaths and injuries frequently occur when kids push themselves against window screens or climb onto furniture located next to an open window.
From 2002-2004, CPSC staff received an average of 25 reports a year of fatalities associated with falls from windows. Children younger than five years of age account for approximately one-third of these reported fatalities. For all age categories, more males died from window falls than females.
Posted at 2:32:15 AM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143516
THURSDAY, MAY 15, 2008
Shoe Prices Take a Step Up
The Wall Street Journal points out that shoe prices are rising quickly:
After a decade of declining prices, footwear makers at all levels are raising prices. The mass-market Payless, a unit of
Collective Brands Inc., recently increased prices on shoes in stores, though it won't say by how much.
Brown Shoe
Co., which makes Via Spiga and Buster Brown footwear and hasn't altered
prices in years, plans an increase of 5% to 12% for fall. And the Nine
West shoe label plans to boost prices on some styles by 15% next year.
The moves reflect higher costs in China, which makes about 85% of shoes
sold in the U.S., as well as higher fuel costs and the weak U.S.
dollar. And they could presage price increases of other goods soon:
Handbags, belts and other leather accessories are made in the same
region in China.
Shoe repair shops may just make a comeback. Will people fix their old shoes rather than buy more expensive new ones?
Posted at 11:55:00 AM
E-mail this item |
Add/View Feedback (1) |
QuickLink this item: A143423
Polar Bear Listed As a 'Threatened' Species
Dirk Kempthorne, secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, announced Wednesday that the polar bear will be placed under the protection of the Endangered Species Act as a threatened species.
The Endangered Species Act has two levels of protection: "endangered"
means a species is in danger of becoming extinct, and "threatened"
means a species is likely to become endangered in the future.
While this designation will protect the polar bear from threats such as hunting, the ruling keeps the door open to gas and oil exploration in Alaska.
The government linked the decline of the bears to melting sea ice.
Secretary Kempthorne said on Wednesday:
Today's decision is based on three findings. First, sea ice is vital
to polar bear survival. Second, the polar bear's sea-ice habitat has
dramatically melted in recent decades. Third, computer models suggest
sea ice is likely to further recede in the future.
Because polar bears are vulnerable to this loss of habitat, they
are, in my judgment, likely to become endangered in the foreseeable
future -- in this case 45 years.
Four graphics tell the story. These graphics are based on actual
satellite photos taken over the past three decades.
This first graphic shows the extent of arctic sea ice in September 1979.

The center of the slide is the North Pole. To the top of the slide
is Russia, to the left is the northern Alaska coast and Canada and
Greenland make up the bottom of the page.
The white is the multi-year ice, five years and older, which
provides many critical habitat functions for polar bears. The light
blue includes seasonal ice that can form and melt in one year, and is
used for hunting. The dark blue is open water.
Here is what the sea ice looked like in September 1989.

Here is what it looked like in September 1999.

Here is what it looked like in September 2007.

Remember, these are based on actual satellite photos.
Here are some resources from the Interior Department:
Although global warming is to blame for the polar bear being listed as a threatened species, Secretary Kempthorne said the listing cannot be used to regulate greenhouse gas emissions:
Polar bears are already protected under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act, which has more stringent protections for polar bears than the
Endangered Species Act does. The oil and gas industry has been
operating in the Arctic for decades in compliance with these stricter
protections. The Fish and Wildlife Service says that no polar bears
have been killed due to encounters associated with oil and gas
operations.
The most significant part of [Wednesday's] decision is what President Bush
observed about climate change policy last month. President Bush noted
that "The Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act and the National
Environmental Policy Act were never meant to regulate global climate
change."
The President is right. Listing the polar bear as threatened can
reduce avoidable losses of polar bears. But it should not open the door
to use the ESA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles,
power plants, and other sources. That would be a wholly inappropriate
use of the Endangered Species Act. ESA is not the right tool to set
U.S. climate policy.
See The New York Times' coverage and The Anchorage (Alaska) Daily News' coverage.
The Wall Street Journal explains:
In announcing the decision Wednesday, Interior Secretary Dirk
Kempthorne said he was compelled to act both by the requirements of the
federal Endangered Special Act and by scientific evidence showing the
bear's habitat is melting. Although the global population of polar
bears has grown from a low of about 12,000 in the late 1960s to
approximately 25,000 today, Mr. Kempthorne said government scientists
had advised him that computer modeling projects "a significant
population decline" by the year 2050. Last year, he added, Arctic sea
ice fell to the lowest level ever recorded by satellite.
"This decision may not be a popular decision, but I believe it is the right decision," Mr. Kempthorne said.
Get LocalIt might be useful to remind your readers/listeners/viewers/Web users about which species are endangered in your state currently. How has the listing helped (if it has) to protect those species?
Breakdown of endangered species
From the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service:
The Fish & Wildlife Service also provides reports on which species:
Posted at 1:06:30 AM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143420
A Note About the Rural Prostitution Project
I wanted to correct a mistake I made yesterday
in my column about
The (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
Gazette's
excellent investigation into prostitution in rural America.
I said the photojournalist who did this work was the only staff photographer at the paper, which was wrong.
Brian Ray is the only staff photographer at the Iowa City Bureau, but the paper has a half dozen photographers. I've corrected it in the online version but wanted to mention it in this e-mail because I suspect many of you
only read the e-mail version of Al's Morning Meeting and don't keep coming back to
Poynter's Web site during the day, even though we continuously update the site and the Morning Meeting blog.
In making this mistake, I learned something about the pride that the people at
The Gazette have for the paper. Within 10 minutes of the Morning Meeting e-mail hitting inboxes around the country, I received four nice e-mails from folks at the paper pointing out the problem.
I wonder how those of you reading this make online corrections, especially when you have a mistake in an e-mail. If it were a horrible defaming kind of mistake I suppose one could send another e-mail. But correcting it online without correcting it in a follow-up e-mail doesn't seem like enough.
I know the best solution is to get it right the first time, but when you don't get it right, how do you handle the correction on your Web site?
Here is how we handle corrections for Poynter Online. I would like for those of you who have thoughts about this
to drop me a line or, better yet, drop a note in
the feedback section of this column for everyone to consider.
Posted at 1:05:47 AM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143369
WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 2008
Join Al Tompkins on the Road and Live Online
I will be hitting the road soon to teach in newsrooms and at conferences. I hope you can join me. Here's what I have coming up:
May 21: Live NewsU Webinar, "Covering High-Profile Stories," with CBS News National Correspondent Byron Pitts, 2 p.m. EDTPitts
will dissect his reporting on some of the biggest stories of the last
decade. He was blocks from the World Trade Center towers when they fell
on Sept. 11, 2001, and he was the lead reporter for CBS News on that
evening's newscast. Pitts has reported from tsunami-torn Sri Lanka, as well
as Iraq, Afghanistan and around America.
He will talk about
his remarkable story of an American soldier who died after being misdiagnosed by military doctors. Pitts was at the soldier's bedside when he passed away.
I
will talk with Pitts during the Webinar about how to find focus when one is
surrounded by chaos and pressed for time. Pitts will share his
interviewing techniques, especially when he is talking with people who
are suffering through a crisis.
You can submit questions during this live one-hour conversation. Go to NewsU.org
to sign up for the Webinar.
May 31: New Mexico Broadcasters Association workshopThis will be held at an amazing facility, the Sandia Resort and Casino, in beautiful Albuquerque.
Click here to sign up.
June 7: Investigative Reporters and Editors Conference, Miami, Fla.I will spend all day Saturday doing one-on-one coaching with folks who bring me their work. We will do on-site sign-ups. You bring a DVD of your work and I will give you feedback. A handful of others may sit in on the sessions to watch and learn with you. I have been doing this for years and I just love it. I always see great work and meet some real up-and-coming investigative journalists. I promise to be nice.
June 14: Colorado Broadcasters Association all-day workshopJoin me in Denver to talk about writing, storytelling, finding story ideas and focusing your stories. You will walk away with story ideas, new enterprise skills and new ways of looking at everyday assignments. This session is short on theory and long on practical tips. We will look at tons of stories.
June 20: Storytelling workshop at RTNDA Canada Conference in Ottawa
This is my second consecutive year working with the outstanding RTNDA Canada national convention. Come prepared to participate -- no sitting on your hands and being quiet!
July 23: Poynter TV journalism boot camp and all-day workshop at UNITY 2008, ChicagoI am so thrilled to be doing this all-day workshop before the convention. We will spend the morning talking about writing and storytelling for video. I will be joined by Victoria Lim, who will teach you how to "follow the paper trail" that unlocks stories. She also will tell you how to "think visually" about stories that seem to have no pictures.
Then, in the afternoon, Rebecca Aguilar, 2007 National Association of Hispanic Journalists Broadcast Journalist of the Year, will join us. Rebecca is known for her ability to find stories that others miss. She will share her secrets for building sources. As you may know, she
lost her job after a controversial interview in Dallas. She will share lessons about being in the vortex of controversy and the subject of news coverage.
Pre-registration is required for this session. Once individuals are registered for the convention, they can log in to the
attendee service center on the Unity Web site, where they will be able to register for the session. These sessions sometimes are standing room only -- don't get left out of this one.
Aug. 10-15: TV Power Reporting Seminar at Poynter I am so pleased to tell you that I will be joined by some of my favorite journalists for this seminar.
Demetria Kalodimos, anchor/investigative reporter for WSMV-TV in Nashville, just won a national Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) award for investigative reporting. She is one of those rare talents who anchors evening newscasts and still reports big, serious stories.
We will also be joined by
KHOU-TV's Angela Kocherga, who has been covering stories along the U.S.-Mexico border for years. I think she is a real talent, and she will help us discover ways to cover immigration stories in every community.
Click here to apply to this seminar, which always draws more folks than we can accept.
We will also be joined late in the week by CBS News photojournalist Les Rose, who is best known for his work with Steve Hartman on their "
Everybody Has a Story" and "
Assignment America" stories.
Aug. 17-21: Advanced Multimedia Reporting With Video seminar at Poynter
CBS News' Les Rose will be here along with Mike Wendland, the tech reporter for the
Detroit Free Press, and former CNN photojournalist Andre Jones. We will take folks who have some basic video skills (you know which end of the camera to look through and may have done a bit of editing) and we will fire up your shooting, editing and storytelling skills. We invite TV folks as well as online and print folks who want to improve their video game.
This would be an especially good seminar for, say, a TV reporter who now must shoot his or her own video or a still photographer who has started shooting video as well.
More on the wayMore dates are firming up in Columbus, Ohio; Houston; Harrisburg, Pa.; and Lexington, Ky., so I will be around to see a lot of you this summer.
I still have some open dates in late summer and fall, and I am booking winter 2008 and 2009 dates now.
Just drop me a note or give me a call at 727-821-9494 and tell me how Poynter or I can help you, your journalism organization or your newsroom.
Posted at 4:00:52 PM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143078
Prostitution in Rural America: A Journalists' Investigation
CORRECTION APPENDED
Right under the noses of police, out in the open in rural Iowa, a prostitution ring involving children flourished. How could this happen? How widespread is prostitution in rural America?
The (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
Gazette launched an investigation and produced an
impressive multimedia Web site and a 14-part series of stories.
The reporter,
Jennifer Hemmingsen, worked on the story while also covering her everyday crime and courts beat.
The Gazette has five staff photographers and two managers in the photo department. Brian Ray, the photographer for this project, is the only photographer in the Iowa City newsroom. (In the e-mail version of this report I incorrectly said he was the only staff photographer.)
The Gazette provided this background for the project:
By poring over hundreds of court records and reports, and through more than two dozen interviews, The Gazette has pieced together over the last year and a half the story of how Robert Sallis and Betty Thompson were able in late 2004 and 2005 to operate a prostitution business right under the noses of police, able to prostitute the 13-year-old M.B. throughout Eastern Iowa for weeks even as their house was being watched by Williamsburg patrol officers.
The secret to their success? Sticking to small towns, keeping a low profile and counting on the silence of their customers and associates.
I interviewed Hemmingsen about the project by e-mail and, as you will see below, I asked some more questions of her and photojournalist Brian Ray via Skype. You can see the video below.
Tompkins: Prostitution? In rural Iowa? How did this investigation start? What's more, why did it start?Hemmingsen: In 2005 and 2006, then-public safety reporter Zack Kucharski began covering a number of court cases accusing men of sexually abusing the same 13-year-old girl. He learned the charges were connected to a massive investigation involving a drug investigation, a prostitution ring and a girl who had been kidnapped and trafficked from Minnesota.
Gazette Senior Editor Lyle Muller, who is himself from a small Iowa town, wanted to know how this could have happened in such rural areas -- the girl was victimized in towns with populations as low as 250 people.
I was hired last March when Zack took another job in the newsroom, and they sat me down to tell me what they knew so far. Charges were still being filed, so I went to more hearings in 2007 and started gathering records. Once Robert Sallis and Betty Thompson were sentenced, investigators agreed to tell us about the case and I started interviewing them, prosecutors and as many people involved with the ring who would talk to me.
Researching the criminal histories ... took a long time, but I think it was worth it -- I also lucked out and found a way to get some investigator and court documents we generally never get to see. All those records gave me a hard-and-fast chronology and a lot of detail to work with when explaining what was going on and who was involved.
In this massive project, no passage stands out more than the opening paragraphs in part one:
In the basement of an ordinary-looking Williamsburg home, the 13-year-old girl was given a choice. Either she would have sex with two men nearly twice her age or she would be given back to her kidnapper.
Already in the week since Demont Bowie told the suburban Minneapolis girl she belonged to him, he'd beaten and abused her, starved her and deprived her of sleep. He traded her body to his friends and even a mechanic. When Demont told her to do something to someone, she did. There was no refusing. He'd said he'd kill her, kill her family, if she tried to leave.
She believed him.
How and why did you select that as the opening to this project?
|
AN EDITOR'S PERSPECTIVE |
Lyle Muller, Gazette senior editor, discusses why the newspaper decided to present this story as a narrative and how he worked with Hemmingsen to give her time to report and write the stories. | |
Hemmingsen: Lyle always tells me a lead should be like a "punch in the nose." He asked me what the most dramatic moment was in this long, complicated saga and I thought immediately of that basement. It's a very rough moment and also a pivotal one -- the girl is free of Demont, who terrorized her, but she's dumped into this whole other nightmare where she's going to be sent out to work as a prostitute for Naughty-bi-Nature. We thought it was a good, central spot to start with before I backed way up and showed how the girl got to that point. I was also hoping it would resonate with readers when the story wound its way back around to that basement scene about halfway through the series -- by that time, they'd have the background to put it all in context.
Based on your reporting in this case, how widespread do you think this kind of child exploitation is in rural America?Hemmingsen: I don't think it's unusual at all. Betty Thompson started prostituting in Cedar Rapids, Iowa when she was young. She had previously been convicted of prostituting an underage Cedar Rapids-area girl in Milwaukee. While the series was running, I got a phone call from a man who said one of the other "escort" services that had previously advertised in
The Gazette was offering young girls, although I don't have proof of that.
Cedar Rapids-based family therapist Virgil Gooding sent us a paper he published in the
Journal of Rural Mental Health (V. 31, No. 2, Spring 2007) talking about a proliferation of a "gangster value system" in smaller communities in which young girls are used to deliver drugs, carry weapons and have sex with and prostitute for the group. He told me on the phone he's talked to 50 girls who have been in the kind of situation we describe, but that people in the wider community haven't listened because no one wants to believe it happens in smaller towns.
Explain how this project ran in the paper and how important the fairly sizable online display was to your journalism. How did the online project come together? Hemmingsen: It ran 1A every day for 14 days. Days 1, 8 and 14 were centerpieces. On the other days it was positioned at the bottom of the page. Brian can speak more to the art challenges -- we knew we wanted it to look different from the rest of the paper, and it wasn't a very art-friendly story. Brian did this cool thing with the black and white photos (they're actually process color) to give them more depth. Design used just a small amount of color so the series had a very distinct look and feel.
Lyle thought it was important that everyone felt invested in the project and had enough time to really bring their strengths. We started meeting with Jason Kristufek, our online editor, in February. Brian, videographer Mike Barnes and I went on a tour of all the locations so I could explain to them what had happened there and where it fit in to the story. Mike had just started working for us a few weeks before the series was set to start running, so he had to catch up fast.
What has the public reaction been to this project? What has changed?Hemmingsen: Most of the feedback has been very positive. People were glued to the story and shocked by the facts. We did get a few calls from people who thought it was too graphic or who thought we were making too big a deal of it, sensationalizing. I'm not sure yet what the long-term effect will be. I did talk to a church group (recently) and the people there were talking about what they might be able to do.
To what extent was race a factor in the public reaction, given that your community is almost all white and the criminals (as well as the victims) all appear to have been black? The johns, as best I can tell from the stories, appeared to all be white.
Hemmingsen: Not as much as I expected. At least one reader commented that it was racist for me to identify the racial and ethnic background of most of the players. The story isn't about race, it's about this criminal organization; but race is definitely there in ways I don't think I completely understand. I have heard from a lot more African American readers about this series than I have on other stories. Not with positive or negative comments per se, but just to talk about the stories or about other stuff that's happening here along the lines of prostitution and the drug trade. Iowans are really reluctant to talk about this stuff. It's something I'm still sort of trying to figure out.
I have to notice that Naughty-bi-Nature, the prostitution company at the center of all of this, advertised in your paper. The public comments online even criticized the paper for accepting escort ads. Has anything changed at the paper because of this?It was a no-brainer that we would include in the story the fact that this business had advertised in our paper. It was one of 25 such businesses that were approved to advertise with
The Gazette because they had provided documentation of a state tax ID number. We were talking about interviewing the ad department for a sidebar, but
The Gazette decided while we were reporting this story to stop accepting ads for spas and escorts. They
announced it while the series was running.
How they pulled it offBelow is another interview I did with Hemmingsen and photojournalist Brian Ray (via Skype). We talk about how they managed their workflow, given that they were nearly always working on other daily stories while they did this project.
Ray also explains how he went about photographing a story that had essentially "already occurred." How can a photojournalist in that situation make photographs of buildings and houses interesting and valuable to the story? And you will hear their advice for how other journalists can look into this story in their rural areas.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article had the incorrect number of photojournalists at The Gazette.
Posted at 10:26:53 AM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143000
Is Dove's "Real Beauty" Campaign Phony?
I think we will have to give
this story a few days to shake out and get to the truth, but it certainly raises public awareness about photo alteration.
To catch you up, the company that makes Dove beauty products is running an ad campaign called "Real Beauty," which features women who are more normal in body type than one usually sees in advertising. (How do you like the way I skated around that one?)
But in an interview with The New Yorker (the article starts
here), a top retouch artist says he cleaned up the so-called "Real Beauties."
Now, the retoucher is saying he didn't change the shape of the women; he only cleaned the photos for dust and color correction.
Dove has been on a multi-year campaign to tell the public, and especially young girls, that they can be proud of who they are and how they look and not to compare themselves to computer-enhanced models. No doubt you have seen the
"Evolution" video; maybe you have seen the follow-up video called "
Onslaught."
This story prompts the question: How much cleanup or retouching is too much in news photography? Is it the same for videography? Is it the same for online journalism?
I am asked this question often in online video seminars and workshops. I default to the question that my Poynter colleague Kenny Irby often asks: "What did you see through the viewfinder?"
Journalism ethics, I believe, allow us to render a photographic (and video) image to match what we saw in reality. Any steps away from that turn what was once true into untrue. For that reason, I do not oppose color correction, burning, dodging and such, which can put the image as close as possible to what existed when we captured it.
All of these techniques are part of the editing process, just as we edit text for print and online. Cropping has to be done carefully to maintain the context of the photograph -- just as we have to keep quotes, for example, in context.
So, what story comes from this? I think it would be refreshing to see newspapers, magazines, news sites, TV stations and radio stations explain what their standards are when it comes to photo editing and image manipulation.
You could do a side-by-side comparison of a real photo and a manipulated one and show subtle changes in the image. You could explain why each change would or would not be allowed in your publication.
For radio, I think explaining when and how you make audio edits would be interesting. Most listeners, I daresay, have no idea that you edit what seem to be live interviews.
For TV and online video: When and how do you use slow-motion? When do you use the fit-to-fill tool on your editing systems? When is it ethical to add sound or music to a story?
Even if you never do a story on these questions, you should be able to explain them to one other in your newsroom.
Posted at 1:16:27 AM
E-mail this item |
Add Your Comments |
QuickLink this item: A143051
Al's Morning Meeting Archive
Or, go back 10 items per page: MORE >
|
Back to Top