Poynter Online Poynter Online
New UserLogin
Poynter Online Main Page
Poynter Career Center
Design / Graphics
Diversity
Ethics
Leadership
Online
Photojournalism
Writing / Editing
TV / Radio
Journalism & Business Values
About Poynter
Seminars
Faculty
Columns
Resource Center
The Poynter Store

Help Poynter


Create Your Personal Page
Add Your Bio
Add Your Photo
Share Your Favorite Links

Signup for Poynter Newsletters
Get Poynter Delivered to Your PDA

ASNE Online Ethics Tool



E-Media Tidbits
A group weblog by the sharpest minds in online media/journalism/publishing

Add/View All E-Media Tidbits Feedback
More E-Media Tidbits

Wednesday, November 15, 2006


Posted by Amy Gahran 5:12:46 PM
Blogs: Popularity Doesn't Equal Influence

technorati
Technorati.com
Technorati's latest snapshot of blog influence (click to enlarge). Consider what this data really shows.
On Nov. 6, Technorati published its latest quarterly state of the blogosphere report. Currently, this search service tracks 57 million feeds, mostly from blogs -- with a strong focus on English-language blogs, especially from North America.

One of the most controversial sections of this report discusses a key concern for any media: influence or perceived authority.

Technorati measures influence by counting inbound links to blogs. This report ranks the approximately 1.5 million blogs it tracks which have attracted at least three inbound links into these groups:

  • Low Authority: Three to nine blogs linking in the last six months (1,111,882 blogs, average 12 posts/month)
  • Middle Authority: 10-99 blogs linking in the last six months (416,073 blogs, average 18 posts/month)
  • High Authority: 100-499 blogs linking in the last six months (26,418 blogs, average 25 posts/month)
  • Very High Authority: 500 or more blogs linking in the last six months (4,070 blogs, average 53 posts/month)

What's wrong with this picture? Well, Technorati's ranking mostly reflects popularity and the effects of posting frequency. In some cases these may correlate with influence or authority -- but not always.

First of all, people link to blogs for all sorts of reasons -- not always because they consider a particular posting authoritative. Often people link to blog postings in order to question, disagree with, refute, or even ridicule them. Or they may link to blogs strictly for entertainment. Also, people often link to blogs in the hope of attracting return links -- and thus traffic. Most serious bloggers watch their referral logs closely, and this strategy does often work.

Posting frequency also can drive inbound links, because if you give people more stuff to read, it's more likely they'll find something worth a link. But more frequent posts aren't always better or more authoritative. In fact, often I've found just the opposite. Some of the blogs I consider most influential don't post daily. Thoughtfulness counts in many circles.

The truth is, influence depends entirely upon the audiences each blog reaches. Sometimes those audiences or communities are very small in terms of numbers. For instance, Alaskablawg is a pretty authoritative blog for certain types of legal and political issues affecting Alaska. It undoubtedly attracts a much smaller audience and fewer inbound links than Firedoglake, currently the top-ranked blog in the "law" category in Technorati's blog directory. Does that make Alaskablawg less influential or authoritative? Probably not -- at least not among the communities it aims to reach.

Influence also depends on the range of topics a blog addresses. A given blogger may be considered extremely authoritative on green chemistry, but less so on parenting or Chinese cooking (even though her blog may address all three topics).

I don't think Technorati's view of influence is entirely amiss. Inbound links can indeed be one factor to gauge influence -- but it can never be the only one. Companies like BuzzLogic have a better grasp of what really constitutes influence in conversational media. Of course, Buzzlogic isn't free, and Technorati is. And in this case of Technorati's analysis, I think you get what you pay for.


E-mail this item | Add/View Feedback (1) | QuickLink this item: A114017



E-Media Tidbits Archive
View items published between:   and   
(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

MAIN | Back to Top




Search Poynter Online
Search Poynter Online

Looking at 'The Bottom Line': Lessons from a Photo Essay
Looking at 'The Bottom Line': Lessons from a Photo Essay
New On Poynter
Your Elevator Speech
by Jill Geisler

War Coverage
What do readers want?

Fireworks Shortage
Al's Tuesday Meeting

More Alzheimer's Cases
Al's Tuesday Meeting

Lester's No-Hitter
Page One Today

BlogHer Meets Obama
By Kim Pearson

Spotty Pet Microchips
Al's Monday Meeting

A Case for Subsidies?
By Rick Edmonds

Taking a Grammar Vote
By Roy Peter Clark

Covering Disabilities
By Susan LoTempio


Resources
Get Tidbits by E-mail (and other Poynter columns)

View All Tidbits Feedback

Pre-11/2002 Archive

Tidbits editor:
Amy Gahran (USA)

Tidbits
Contributors:

Alan Abbey (Israel)
Paul Bradshaw (UK)
Matthew Buckland (S. Africa)
Juan C. Camus (Chile)
Thomas Crampton (Hong Kong)
Michelle Ferrier (USA)
A. Adam Glenn (USA)
Rich Gordon (USA)
Tish Grier (USA)
Barb Iverson (USA)
Steve Klein (USA)
Vincent Maher (S. Africa)
Maryn McKenna (USA)
Joe Michaud (USA)
Bill Mitchell (USA)
Steve Outing (USA)
Kim Pearson (USA)
Ernst Poulsen (Denmark)
Katja Riefler (Germany)
Laura Ruel (USA)
Ken Sands (USA)
Ezra Shapiro (USA)
Maurreen Skowran (USA)
Mac Slocum (USA)
Fons Tuinstra (China)
Monique van Dusseldorp (Netherlands)
Peter M. Zollman (USA)
  Site Map | Advertise | Search | Contact | FAQ | Our Guidelines QuickLink  
  Copyright © 1995-2008 The Poynter Institute
  801 Third Street South | St. Petersburg, FL 33701 | Phone (888) 769-6837
  Site developed & hosted by DataGlyphics, Inc.



Poynter Career Center
Tuesday: Color Paper in Portfolio?
Giving Credit Costs Little