Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

ABC's Payment to Casey Anthony Raises Questions about Ethics, Checkbook Journalism
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

E-Media Tidbits

Home > E-Media Tidbits
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Amy Gahran
A group weblog about the intersection of news & technology


Why Automated Tweeting Is a Bad Idea
Posted by Amy Gahran at 5:36 PM on Jul. 1, 2009
Earlier today, The Wall Street Journal posted this bit of breaking news on Twitter:

WSJ truncated tweet
WSJ, via Twitter
Posted July 1 by The Wall Street Journal via Twitterfeed. Notice the bad cut-off.

The Journal, like some other news organizations, uses a popular service called Twitterfeed to automatically generate tweets based on an RSS feed. Normally, I'm all in favor of automation that saves time and effort, but Twitter is one place where automation usually doesn't work, especially for news.

A much better strategy is to manually write or edit your tweets to make sure they'll fit on Twitter. You only have 140 characters total to work with, including spaces and links, after all. This not only allows you to make the length work, but also to add powerful context like hashtags.

If you must automate your tweets, I recommend limiting the length of your text to 100 characters. This leaves room for the auto-generated link, and also for proper attribution to you when people retweet your news (which you really want them to do).

Thanks to Brian Boyer for the tip.

Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs