Friday, January 13, 2006
A Logical Move: Cutting Print Stock Tables
Here's a serious question: Is there a stock-market investor
left anywhere who relies on print-edition newspaper stock tables for his/her
daily fix of stock price information?
OK. There may be three. Somewhere. Two of them are probably
reading the stock tables in the
Wall Street Journal, and the other one
perhaps in the
New York Times or the
Financial Times.
Everyone else? Online, of course. Or on their mobile phones,
PDAs, Blackberries, Blueberries, or Whateverberries.
So why do newspapers that aren't the
Journal or the
Times persist in running stock tables? Out of habit, nothing more.
The
Chicago Tribune has become the latest paper to
announce that it will drastically cut the space it devotes to stock prices.
Good move. Eliminating one page of stock listings a day probably leads
to savings of a couple of million bucks annually. Cutting more than two
pages? Perhaps a saving of, say, $5 million a year -- and another
million or two if newsprint prices keep rising, as expected.
It'd be great if they put just $3 million of that back into
the corporate pocket (disclosure: I own Tribune Co. stock) and devote
the rest to maintaining reportorial staff and newshole elsewhere,
preferably in the local section.
The reasons for cutting print stock tables are obvious. "Much of
the detailed daily information on stocks will be available on
chicagotribune.com, where readers can get a much wider and more complete
range of information," according to associate managing editor for business
Jim Kirk. Also, "The
more widespread use of the Internet for this type of information and the
rise of global trading ... has limited the utility of quotes published
in the newspaper." And the paper was up-front about the savings in
newsprint costs. It also said it would provide a toll-free telephone
stock listing service.
This is a trend that should continue. Don't be surprised if next year at
this time, the only daily papers carrying extensive stock tables are the
aforementioned
WSJ,
NYT, and
FT. That would be a step forward in
rationalizing newspaper products, and getting away from the "we've
always done it this way" mentality that still rules at so many
newspapers.
E-mail this item |
Add/View Feedback (1) |
QuickLink this item: A95132
E-Media Tidbits Archive
MAIN
|
Back to Top