In the article "
Snoring Out Loud: Statesman blunders with bland blogging" written for the
Austin Chronicle,
Kevin Brass casts a critical eye at the blogging efforts of the Texas capital's main daily newspaper, the
American-Statesman. (I'm quoted oh-so-briefly in his piece.)
His focus on the
Stateman's
public blog site, designed to let anyone blog, helped me re-focus on
the model of news websites setting up free services where anyone in the
community can set up a blog and have it hosted by the news
organization. I think there's a key flaw in this type of model, as it's
typically deployed.
The problem: Many people within any community already are blogging, using popular services like
Blogger,
LiveJournal,
MSN Spaces, etc. Is a newspaper going to convince those people to switch their blogs over to the paper's website? Unlikely.
For a news organization to have a truly effective public blogging
service, I think it's important to not only offer to host new blogs (as
the
Statesman
website does), but to welcome existing bloggers in as well. That means
figuring out how to incorporate Blogger/LiveJournal/MSN Spaces/et al
blogs into the mix.
That can be as simple as using
RSS to feature new posts from external
blogs by community members. A Public Blogs page would be improved, I
think, by having a larger mix of community bloggers -- some blogging
using the news organization's blogging technology, others using
external services. The walled-garden public-blogging approach doesn't
make much sense in a world where third-party blogging services are so
widely used by members of your community.
Yes, this is a bit of a leap for traditional news organizations, for it
means there's less control over the content of blogs hosted by other
services. But is it really? If you don't like the content of a
community member's external blog, simply don't feature it.
Oops. Here's the link. http://nashvilleistalking.com/