FRIDAY, MAY 5, 2006
National Review Online
Perhaps the Christian Science Monitor shouldn’t have lent its storied imprimatur to an inexperienced freelancer like
Jill Carroll, says
Catherine Seipp. "Was it really ethical for lives to be endangered and lost because some girl is 'passionate' (as Carroll's defenders say she was) about Iraq? Especially when the Monitor doesn't have the money that big news organizations have to make sure she had the proper bodyguards?"
Posted at 2:05:54 PM
E-mail this item |
QuickLink this item: A101012
Romenesko Archive
MAIN
|
Back to Top
