THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 2007
Seattle Times
The Seattle Times Co. says it decided to settle its legal fight with Hearst in part because it was "fairly certain" the costly struggle would have dragged on even after a binding-arbitration trial decided the matter. "The statement raised another question: Who would have pressed the fight?" writes
Eric Pryne. Both sides had said they wouldn't challenge the arbitrator's decision.
Posted at 7:24:16 AM
E-mail this item |
QuickLink this item: A121718
Romenesko Archive
MAIN
|
Back to Top
