Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

SXSW Panel: iPad May Create New Markets for Multimedia, Ads
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Romenesko

Home > Romenesko
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Jim Romenesko
Your daily fix of media industry news, commentary, and memos.
Updated at
6:16 p.m.

Shafer's my mentor
Says Plotz.
(Mediabistro.com)

POSTED WEDNESDAY
Economist editor
On e-readers, long-form journalism.
(Beet.tv)

More BW layoffs
Coming Thursday. | More.
(Daily Finance/NYP)

POSTED TUESDAY
The NewWest.net story
Editor tells it.
(mediagaggle.com)

POSTED MONDAY
NYT's National Enquirer story
TSG's critique.
(The Smoking Gun)

LEFT RAIL ARCHIVE

E-mail Romenesko
Send letters, memos,
and feedback.






POPULAR TOPICS


NPR: Voice story about film critic flap is inaccurate
From ANNA CHRISTOPHER, NPR media relations: The Village Voice piece that you're linking to is full of inaccuracies. Bad reporting (or a complete lack of reporting) has turned this story into one about NPR's supposed ill treatment of Nathan Lee, which is completely fabricated.

If you're curious, the parts of the Village Voice's article that are completely untrue:

--NPR sent Nathan Lee the edited text of his review prior to publication, and he agreed to the edits.

--NPR also gave Nathan the option to not publish the review, or to publish the review as edited (without the names). He would be paid in full either way. Because he believed the issues the film raises are important ones, Nathan agreed the best course would be to remove the names and publish his review. He requested that his byline by removed, and a note be added explaining the absence of the byline.

--Nathan's byline was removed by NPR at his request, prior to publication of the article on Friday. The article was posted to the NPR.org homepage where it remained for many days.

--NPR removed Nathan's comment to NPR.org only after speaking with him, and with his explicit approval. Nathan agreed that his comment, which named the names edited out of the review, broke NPR's previous agreement with him and ran counter to the NPR policy in question. At that time, NPR offered, again, to take down the review, which he declined.

Posted at 10:48 AM on May 13, 2009
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Recent Comments:
But the gist of the story is true. -NPR wouldn't publish the review unless the names were removed.... More.
Read All Comments (2 comments)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs