Poynter Online Poynter Online
New UserLogin
Poynter Online Main Page
Poynter Career Center
Design / Graphics
Diversity
Ethics
Leadership
Online
Photojournalism
Writing / Editing
TV / Radio
Journalism & Business Values
About Poynter
Seminars
Faculty
Columns
Resource Center
The Poynter Store

Help Poynter


Create Your Personal Page
Add Your Bio
Add Your Photo
Share Your Favorite Links

Signup for Poynter Newsletters
Get Poynter Delivered to Your PDA

ASNE Online Ethics Tool



Poynter on the Record
Poynter faculty quoted in print, broadcast, or online and stories about The Poynter Institute

Add/View All Poynter on the Record Feedback
More Poynter on the Record

Monday, August 13, 2007


Journalistic Fraud Damages 'Mainstreem' Credibility
By Nathanial Burchfiel
CNSNews.com
Published 8/10/2007
 
Excpert:

In a statement posted on its website, TNR editors said their investigation of his reports found that the incident took place in Kuwait, not Iraq. "When presented with this important discrepancy, Beauchamp acknowledged his error," the statement said. "We sincerely regret this mistake."

But even that mistake is enough to raise serious questions about the accuracy of the rest of Beauchamp's writing and about TNR's handling of the case, according to Bob Steele, a scholar for journalism values at the Poynter Institute.

"[I]f the writer, the Baghdad Diarist, can not get that information straight, it raises reasonable questions about whether any of his other facts are also either illegitimate, downright wrong, or maybe even deceptive," Steele told Cybercast News Service.

Steele also criticized other factors in the case, saying he was "troubled" by the fact that Beauchamp was in a relationship with TNR reporter Elspeth Reeves. The two are married. "It raises the specter of competing loyalties and potential conflicts of interest," he said.

Steele said the decision to grant Beauchamp anonymity — TNR printed his columns under the pen name Scott Thomas — "can and should be questioned. There are times when news organizations give the protection of anonymity or confidentiality to sources or to, in rare cases, authors of pieces. But those situations should be in the exceptional case and it's very questionable in my mind whether it was legitimate in this circumstance to give that protection of anonymity."

Posted by Poynter Institute 12:09:32 PM
E-mail this item | Add Your Comments | QuickLink this item: A128393



Poynter on the Record Archive
View items published between:   and   
(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

MAIN | Back to Top




Search Poynter Online
Search Poynter Online

When Principles Collide: The <i>NYT</i> and the CIA Interrogator
When Principles Collide: The NYT and the CIA Interrogator
New On Poynter
NYT and CIA at Odds
By Bob Steele

Gas Station TV is Here
By Rick Edmonds

Doom, or Not?
By Alan Abbey

Hostages Freed
Page One Today

Secondhand Twitter
By Amy Gahran

How I Wrote Father Tim
By Roy Peter Clark

Stupid Filter Tricks
By Amy Gahran

Workers' Comp Stories
Al's Tuesday Meeting

Ideas from Art Caplan
Al's Monday Meeting

Price of AWOL Dads
By Bobbi Bowman

Today's Mini-Tidbits
By Amy Gahran

Poynter Summer Fellows
By Jan Leach

Russert & Catholicism
By Roy Peter Clark

Wikipedia Caves
By Fons Tuinstra

Tableau Vivant Q&A
By Sara Quinn


  Site Map | Advertise | Search | Contact | FAQ | Our Guidelines QuickLink  
  Copyright © 1995-2008 The Poynter Institute
  801 Third Street South | St. Petersburg, FL 33701 | Phone (888) 769-6837
  Site developed & hosted by DataGlyphics, Inc.



Poynter Career Center
Thursday: When Should Intern Start Job Search?
Retaining Top Performers During Difficult Times