Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

When Photojournalists Get Stuck Between Police, Protesters
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars
Home > TV & Radio
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, e-mail, Permalink, Share
11:59 AM  Jun. 14, 2006
Getting Wise
By Mervin Block (More articles by this author)

RELATED RESOURCES


For more tips on making your writing clearer, here are some more Poynter Online articles by Merv Block:

"Even Networks Mangle and Strangle Language"

"False First"

"The '60 Minutes' Quiz"

An ancient sage said, "From the errors of others, a wise man corrects his own." He wasn't ancient when he said it, but he lived in ancient times. Even so, his advice is timely -- and timeless.

A wise man -- OK, a wise person -- does learn to correct his or her errors. But in newsrooms, errors should also be corrected by editors. Yet, when you run across errors like those that follow, you wonder whether editors have been deleted:
"Good evening tonight from the French Quarter in New Orleans." ("NBC Nightly News," Feb. 28, 2006)
"Good evening tonight?" Was tonight used in case some listener doesn't understand evening? Or was it merely the newscast's practice to insert tonight as often as possible? In fact, the newscast had used a variation of that mismatched time element previously:
"In this country this evening, the flow of commerce along the vital Eastern Seaboard has been disrupted tonight by a tanker-truck accident." ("NBC Nightly News," Jan. 10, 2005)
The phrase "has been disrupted" precludes the use of a time element. Besides, the script distorted the time element because the accident had happened more than eight hours before the newscast. No wonder someone (named Block) suggested renaming the program "Tonightly News."
"Myself and other journalists were allowed back into the court just in time to see the case adjourned ... " ("CBS Evening News," March 15, 2006)
Myself should never be used in place of I or me. Correct use: "I will do it myself." (Intensive.) "I hurt myself." (Reflexive.)

That report was delivered live, so no one could have caught the misused myself in time. But I wonder whether an editor, producer or anchor later told the correspondent of the mistake -- and suggested spending some quality time with a grammar book. Better: "The reporters were let back into the court just in time..." No need for the self-reference; as the adage has it, "No newsman is bigger than the news."
"An escaped convicted killer is still on the loose. Write this name down: Charles Victor Thompson. He was able to walk out of a Texas jail ... " (CNN, noon, Nov. 5, 2005)
Please don't give me orders. Anyway, what good would it do for me to write down his name?
"The number of attacks against Americans are still stable or falling, and it's the Iraqi security forces that are paying the highest price." ("CBS Evening News." April 16, 2006)
Another live report, but still subject to the rules: Because number was preceded by the, it should have been followed by is, not are. If number had been preceeded by a, it would be followed by are.
"The storm bore down on a 20-mile stretch along the Mississippi River from Illinois to Missouri to Kansas." ("NBC Nightly News," March 12, 2006)
Also live. Not even a 200-mile stretch could have put Kansas on the Mississippi.
"It's just one more thing to angst about in a season that already stresses out millions." ("CBS Evening News," March 23, 2006)
Angst is not in too many listeners' vocabulary. And the reporter's verbification of angst, which is a noun, made its use even riskier. If a word isn't widely known and commonly used, then it's not a "broadcast word." So angst gives me agita.
"I'm _____ _____ on the Paraguay-Brazil border, and you'll never believe what you can buy here." ("CBS Evening News," March 6, 2006)
Why wouldn't I believe it? For years, I've been reading in The New York Times, The New Yorker and elsewhere about smuggling, counterfeiting and other illegal activities in Ciudad del Este.

What I do find hard to believe is that a network newscast would treat a thrice-told tale as big news. The lead-in to the two-parter called the place the "new Crossroads of Crime." New? Four years ago, a New York Times reporter wrote, in a 1,600-word article dated March 15, 2002, "The Triple Frontier where Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay meet has long been South America's busiest contraband and smuggling center, a corrupt, chaotic place where just about anything from drugs and arms to pirated software and bootleg whiskey are available to anyone who can pay the price."
"Iran today lashed out against a resolution by the U.N. nuclear monitoring agency that could lead to Security Council sanctions against Iran." (NPR's "Morning Edition," Sept. 26, 2005)
The problem is today -- on two counts. The Iranian "lashing out" occurred about 24 hours earlier. Today -- really, yesterday -- should follow the verb, not precede it. Putting today before the verb violates a basic rule of broadcast newswriting: It isn't conversational. You don't say, "I tonight am going to a movie."
"Does he have to nominate a conservative to satisfy the base of his party or a moderate who would be acceptable enough to Democrats to avoid a long and prolonged fight?" (ABC's "World News Tonight," Oct. 27, 2005)
Long and prolonged? Way too much longitude.
"Up next, the man still in the eye of a political hurricane, Michael Brown, the former director of FEMA. Our exclusive interview with him in a moment." ("Fox News Sunday," 9 a.m., March 5, 2006)
Exclusive? "NBC Nightly News" also had an "exclusive interview" with Brown Feb. 28. Eleven days before that, Feb. 17, CNN carried what it called an exclusive look at a filmmaker's interview with Brown. Almost six months earlier, on Sept. 1, 2005, Ted Koppel interviewed Brown on ABC's "Nightline" -- but did not trumpet the interview as exclusive. Nor did Martin Smith call his interview Nov. 22 on PBS's "Frontline" exclusive. Months later, though, Fox and NBC did call their interviews of Brown exclusive. No wonder exclusive has lost its meaning.
"Obviously, you must be very elated at this news." (NPR's "Morning Edition," March 23, 2006)
Please don't tell an interviewee how she feels. Ask her how she feels.
"The fires in Texas [and] Oklahoma, now spreading to New Mexio, are being fueled by the worst drought in decades." ("CBS Evening News," Jan. 2, 2006)
I don't want to add fuel to the fire, but how can a drought fuel a fire?
"Inch after inch, the rain fuels these rivers through towns with strong currents." ("NBC Nightly News," Oct. 13, 2005)
Can rain fuel a river? Come on, let's stop fueling around.

A word to the wise is usually insufficient, so we all need to just wise up.      
     


Mervin Block, a newswriting coach, is the author of "Writing Broadcast News -- Shorter, Sharper Stronger." His tips and articles are at http://www.mervinblock.com. You can reach him (or sign up for his free tips list) at merblo@aol.com.       
Tools: Print, e-mail, Permalink, Comment On This Article, Share
Recent Comments:
Editors
Mervin Block has once again hit the nail on the head. Editors in newsrooms are responsible for correcting spelling, grammar and fact-checking before a story hits the airwaves. Mervin's article demonstrates that before is the operative word. Yet, too many "post mortem meetings" are held AFTER a newscast to point...
Maria Dorfner, 7:20 AM July 16, 2006
Read All Comments (1 comments)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
Ask The Recruiter Ask The Recruiter Friday: How Bad is a Gap in My Clips?
Colleen on Careers Colleen on Careers You Worked Hard to Get the Interview, Make it Count