Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

Newspaper.com: Community Weblog Central

Page 1 of 1 
Show me the money
6/16/2002 3:28:29 PM
Posted By: Bill Dunphy

While the notion of newspapers hosting weblogs for its "readers" certainly strikes a chord with blog fans everywhere, the DaveNet piece (Newspapers and weblogs, Thu, Jun 13, 2002; by Dave Winer) falls woefully short of building any kind of case for the economic viability of the idea. Winer offers 2 possibilities: some kind of micropayment for readers viewing (accessing) the content and a hosting fee for local business blogs. They might work, but Winer doesn't bother discussing the pros and cons of these models and as such leaves us with little faith in the inevitablity or wisdom of his idea

Re: legal ramifications
6/14/2002 10:32:49 AM
Posted By: Steve Outing

Reply to Rick Brown (item below):
I think this issue could use some more looking into; perhaps I'll write a column on the concept. Meantime, off the top of my head, there are a couple ways that this can pass legal muster:

1) You treat your hosted weblogs much as you do your discussion forums. You set rules and guidelines for those public weblogs you host, and if the rules are violated you remove the weblog after the fact just as you'd remove a nasty discussion forum posting. You don't edit public weblogs beforehand, just as you don't screen forum postings.

2) You set yourself up to be the local version of Blogger, which is merely the provider of technology to allow folks to publish weblogs -- but does not claim any control over or responsibility for the content of any of the blogs. That'll take some fancy legal language, no doubt.

I think No. 1 is the answer. Public weblogs are really just a variation of the discussion forums that news sites have successfully run for years.


Get over the legal ramifications?
6/14/2002 4:45:57 AM
Posted By: Rick Brown


I don't understand how Steve and other advisors can say "get over it" when the legal ramifications
are not just some secondary issue, but should be of prime concern. I'm only a layman, but as far
as I understand, newspaper web sites that allow unvetted material to be posted are not necessarily
immune to being co-defendants in a libel suit. Sure, AOL got dismissed from the suit against Matt
Drudge based on a court's interpretation of federal law, but AOL is an Internet Service Provider while
most web sites are not. I'm uncertain that case law has decided whether a newspaper site would be
exempt from litigation in the same way that AOL was. Can anyone elaborate on this issue and/or point
to some sources? Why wouldn't a newspaper web site have to enforce the same journalistic standards
on public weblogging that it would anywhere else under its brand name?



Page 1 of 1 
Return to Previous Page

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs