Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Young Journalists Use Facebook Ads to Reach Prospective Employers
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

Spam Filters = Fewer Online Publishers?

Page 1 of 1 
It's working; no incentive to change
8/8/2002 9:19:33 PM
Posted By: Rick Brown


Let's stop and think logically for a moment. Spam filters must be working to reduce (not eliminate)
the problem for ISPs or the ISPs wouldn't be employing them. Yes, I agree that they should be
implemented more judiciously. But here's a point that publishers need to get. I think the mistake
that publishers are making is to assume that ISPs owe them support in the e-mail channel when the
ISP will not make, and probably will lose, money by expanding the bandwidth to relay and store
exponentially increasing amounts of bulk mail. Where's the financial incentive in that?

Part of the problem is that bulk mailers are basing their business models on chewing up
more free resources (e-mail bandwidth) than what's available. Many of those folks are spammers
using illegitimate tactics to hijack resources, but some of them are trustworthy publishers running
legitimate opt-in services. Regardless of the legitimacy, it's the quantity that matters. If the resources
across the system are finite, something has to be done to reduce the congestion or else the system
will collapse. The ISPs are doing something and it's having some success in spite of its imperfections.
If you can't offer them a financial incentive to change, I think you're going to be griping for a long time.




White lists
8/8/2002 2:26:30 PM
Posted By: Ian Jindal

In the same way as "bulk mail" houses register with the Post Office to ensure that their mail gets through there's a role here for a distributed "white list" of bona fide publishers. While good spam filters allow individuals to 'white list' addresses/types which are exceptions to their rules (I use SpamAssassin) there could be a general whitelist against which one could check incoming mail. Shared blacklists exists: all that's needed now is someone to start (and validate) a whitelist...

Spam Filters don't work
8/8/2002 2:03:01 PM
Posted By: Gretchen Passantino

Spam filters don't work. The spammer just find out ingeneous ways around the filters, while us honest people get stopped for the most innocent communications. And content filters don't protect us or our children from objectional material, either, as my now 18 year old son proved in a school project where he proved he could easily circumvent the high school's extremely expensive content filter and access pornography, illegal drug info, teen sex topics, etc. He's smart enough and responsible enough that he doesn't ordinarily access this stuff because he's a better person than that, not that he can't because of an inflexible, ignorant filter system.

Page 1 of 1 
Return to Previous Page

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs