Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

Satellite Radio Flopping -- Lesson for Web?

Page 1 of 1 
Save the grave blanket
8/30/2002 11:20:32 AM
Posted By: Mike Reilly

For those of you locked into only your selected tunes (how dull), I suppose radio has no value. But like learning new things from a newspaper serendipitously, some of us music lovers like having new and/or different stuff introduced to us by radio producers/djs, etc. If you are stuck in rock-only, classics-only or R&B-only you may be happy with pre-satrad technologies, BUT if your music moves with your mood, only satrad can supply the right combination.
Add always-on, no commercials and CD quality not to mention BBC news (far better than ANY US news source) and for the price of your two Starbucks a day I get outrageous radio when and where I want all month. Yeah, I paid for the gear - equal to a new desktop PC to do house and car, extending the system reach to over a dozen speakers and my location roughly 80 per cent of the time (I run my buisiness from home). Satellite radio won't hit the dream predictions of the VCs behind it, but once they get out of the picture, the business will fly -- a yearfrom now tens of thousands of cars will have been shipped with it onboard. Sorry WSJ & Steve, this was a premature burial.As you move your eyes away from graveside you may notice satrad slipping in nicely alongside AM/FM/TV/Sat/Web and live entertainment -- funny how predictions of their demise were so sure half a century and more ago.

wrong audience
8/29/2002 2:27:27 PM
Posted By: Greg Brown

$120 bucks a year!?!? Are they nuts??

Most of these pay-by-the-month arrangements, be they ISP service, online access to news or games or satellite radio miss the point: The initial audience, geeks, simply do not have the money or the interest. Your average, garden-variety geek already has an MP3 player jacked into their existing car stereo, so a CD burned with their personal mix can play 13 hours of music, ad-free obviously, and it's THEIR mix.

You want me to pay for radio? Back-end it into the price of the car as an option, say $500 extra for life-of-lease or five years of service, give Ford or Volks a 40% cut for selling it, take the money and run. Otherwise, no way. Too easy to replicate for free or nearly free, I'm afraid.

Once again, engineers run amok. Just because you can do something doesn't mean people will pay money for it. Just ask the folks at Iridium.

Right Conclusion, Wrong Reasons
8/28/2002 3:42:50 PM
Posted By: Eric Michaels

"Charging for information is wrong"? Since when? Last time I checked, the only newspapers I could find for free were weekly shoppers, and I'm still sending checks every year to renew my magazine subscriptions. And while network television remains free, cable television is not -- and, when you get down to it, isn't that the same kind of model that XM radio is pursuing.

The truth is, XM is failing not because people won't pay a subscription fee, or because they find free radio "good enough." It's failing because people already have a mechanism for listening to whatever kind of music they want to in their cars -- tape decks and CD players, which are standard in virtually all makes and models these days. In fact, other than traffic reports and baseball games, I hardly listen to radio anymore, and I bet most people don't, either. That's the real reason XM is struggling: It provides a service no one needs.

Dot Com Revolution...
8/28/2002 2:40:08 PM
Posted By: Evan

The idea of charging for information is wrong. At no point should such a powerful tool as the internet be allotted only for those who can afford it. History dictates that products generally decrease in price over time. Since web sites, with the exception of some less reputable sites, have in nearly all cases been free, mass groups of people will probably refuse to pay when other sites can offer the same content for free. This will be a ".com revolution" as large establish sites are passed over for smaller free sits.

Page 1 of 1 
Return to Previous Page

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs