Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Young Journalists Use Facebook Ads to Reach Prospective Employers
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

View Forum Post

Topic: Letters Sent to Romenesko
Date/Time: 11/15/2005 4:44:08 PM
Title: Insulting explanation
Posted By: Jim Romenesko
 
From STEPHEN D. BURGARD, director, Northeastern University School of Journalism: Readers got a wholly inadequate explanation today from Andres Martinez, editorial page editor of the Los Angeles Times, in response to widespread questions and concerns about the discontinuation of Robert Scheer's column. It was patronizing and insulting to their intelligence. Why can't you say, "It was time for a change...and that we originally had hoped to continue the column through the year but the columnist did not agree with our decision, so it has ended now." The paper to date has not offered a convincing explanation for ending two regular features - Michael Ramirez's cartoon and Scheer's column. In the absence of offering such an explanation, it would have been better to say nothing. [Permalink]


View Complete Forum Topic

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs