Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Rather: 'Public is Not Well-Served by Political Coverage Today'
Most Recent Articles
1.Apple iOS increases share of Internet traffic
10:30 AM Sep. 2, 2010
2.Is WSJ hurting USA Today more than NYT?
10:21 AM Sep. 2, 2010
3.Rather: 'If we'd had spell check back then I'd still be in the newspaper business'
5:34 AM Sep. 2, 2010
4.Rather: 'Public is Not Well-Served by Political Coverage Today'
5:32 AM Sep. 2, 2010
5.The 15-Year Home Loan Rises in Popularity
12:05 AM Sep. 2, 2010
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
1.Poynter Leadership Academy
Apply by August 30
2.Critical Tools for the Non-Traditional Journalist
Apply by September 20
3.Multimedia Storytelling With Video
Apply NOW

News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

View Forum Post

Topic: Memos Sent to Romenesko
Date/Time: 12/7/2005 10:22:30 AM
Title: NYT business editor's memo re Wikipedia
Posted By: Jim Romenesko
 
From: [New York Times business editor] Larry Ingrassia
To: [Business staff]
Subject: wiki-whatdia?

Colleagues,

You probably saw Kit Seelye's smart Week-in-Review story about inaccurate information in Wikipedia. In case you didn't, please take a look. Since the story ran, she has received a number of e-mail messages about other inaccurate information on Wikipedia. We shouldn't be using it to check any information that goes into the newspaper.

Larry

View Complete Forum Topic

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
See All Jobs
Add Your Resume
Post Your Job
Become a Member
More media jobs