News & Tips
Training
Chats
Top Story
Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
Most Recent Articles
1.
Poynter announces publication of a new collection of newspaper pages
9:00 AM Nov. 21, 2009
2.
Poynter's Times Publishing Co. sells Governing
5:15 PM Nov. 20, 2009
3.
Recommendation for Fewer PAP Screens Sure to Set Off Controversy
10:32 AM Nov. 20, 2009
4.
Gene Patterson to Jack Nelson: Save Us a Desk Up There in That Celestial Newsroom
7:03 AM Nov. 20, 2009
5.
Public TV, Radio Stations to Increase Local Investigative Coverage
6:19 AM Nov. 20, 2009
More Recent Articles
6.
Woods: Plagiarism Never Justified
3:47 PM Nov. 19, 2009
7.
What Great Bosses Know about Quiet Leaders
3:39 PM Nov. 19, 2009
8.
Archived Chat: How can Journalism Schools Encourage Innovation?
2:10 PM Nov. 19, 2009
9.
Studying Newspapers in a Time of Change
11:51 AM Nov. 19, 2009
10.
Testing CUNY's New Business Models with Adjusted Assumptions
10:29 AM Nov. 19, 2009
Fewer Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
1.
'Daily Show' Producers, Writers Serious about Comedy & Media Criticism
6:55 AM Nov. 17, 2009
2.
Poynter's Times Publishing Co. sells Governing
5:15 PM Nov. 20, 2009
3.
Good Decisions and Great Journalism
12:00 AM Aug. 4, 2002
4.
Guide to Writing Headlines
12:00 AM Jul. 1, 1999
More E-mailed Articles
Recent Comments
1.
Standard Times way off
on
Blogger's attacks on columnnist "could be actionable."
Posted By:
Sean Leurini
9:35 AM Nov. 21, 2009
2.
Group therapy-type journalism
on
CNN's John King believes in steering conversations
Posted By:
Tom Traubert
11:29 PM Nov. 20, 2009
3.
Free E-Meters to St. Pete Times subscribers?
on
Poynter's Times Publishing Co. sells Governing
Posted By:
Bradley Fikes
8:25 PM Nov. 20, 2009
4.
Daley's talk
on
Chicago mayor blames media for Oprah's departure
Posted By:
Robb Hill
4:26 PM Nov. 20, 2009
5.
Huh?
on
Chicago mayor blames media for Oprah's departure
Posted By:
Jeffrey Knight
1:40 PM Nov. 20, 2009
More Recent Comments
6.
T'was the blog post, not the call
on
More on the Post-Dispatch vulgar comment brouhaha
Posted By:
Allan Maurer
1:19 PM Nov. 20, 2009
7.
Not just King ...
on
CNN's John King believes in steering conversations
Posted By:
Alex Dering
12:33 PM Nov. 20, 2009
8.
What is King? A group therapist
on
CNN's John King believes in steering conversations
Posted By:
Tom Traubert
12:13 PM Nov. 20, 2009
9.
Tom Traubert is a fake name
on
Fayetteville editor protests Palin coverage blackout
Posted By:
Bradley Fikes
11:08 AM Nov. 20, 2009
10.
What about the issue touched on in the cartoon?
on
Newsday under fire for running "Fillmore" cartoon
Posted By:
Algerco Algerco
10:58 AM Nov. 20, 2009
Fewer Recent Comments
Recent Tags
1.
Careers: Transitions
2.
Magazines
3.
Media criticism
4.
Business models
5.
Advertising
More Recent Tags
6.
Layoffs/buyouts/staff cuts
7.
Investigative journalism
8.
Careers: Development /growth
9.
Live Chat
10.
Newsroom culture
Fewer Recent Tags
Community Activity
Welcome
Asia Sanders
to the
Journalism Conversations: Ethics & Diversity
group.
Read
Julian Cordero's
blog post
A simple way we can all share the wealth!
in the
Ethics & Diversity
blog.
Read
Gena Fitzgerald's
comment to the blog post
new media titles?
in the
Online & Multimedia
blog.
View a
photo
that
Bob Howarth
has posted.
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
1.
A New Curriculum for a New Journalism - Jan. 6-8, 2010
Apply by November 23
2.
Multimedia Journalism for College Educators - February 1-5, 2010
Apply by December 14
3.
NewsU: Write Your Heart Out: The Craft of the Personal Essay - January 25-February 19, 2010
Apply by January 4
All Poynter Seminars
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
All NewsU Courses
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars
Romenesko
Latest News
Reporting
& Writing
Ethics &
Diversity
Leadership
& Business
Visual
Journalism
Online &
Technology
TV &
Radio
Journalism
Education
Poynter Forums
View Forum Post
Topic:
Letters Sent to Romenesko
Date/Time:
4/25/2007 12:34:16 PM
Title:
Last word on a mini-flap
Posted By:
Jim Romenesko
From
ERIC ALTERMAN
: A cocktail party conversation into which I was foolishly corralled, was misreported on Gawker, and has since reached ridiculous proportions of debate and discussion. The transcript of it was put up by the Observer and is linked here at Romenesko. I would therefore appreciate the opportunity to clarify a few points in the hopes of (finally) putting this thing to bed..
1) I was minding my own business at a brunch when Ana Marie Cox initiated this conversation. I had no intention of speaking to her and had I known that what I was saying would be inaccurately passed along to a website that cared nothing for accuracy, I would never have done so. My whole point here is that (as with Joe Klein), I rarely if ever go around looking for fights with people with whom I happen to disagree. I do that enough in print, for a living, without wishing to make it my entire life. (This also speaks the relevance of the use of "my friend" in the text, as in "I don't feel a need to hassle my friends.")
2) In every instance, I am responding to accusations that she is leveling at me. I told her, I'm fine with what she does. My issue with Time is that they hired a "liberal" gossip writer who specializes in articles about "ass-fucking" to offset their conservative heavy-hitters who regularly abuse liberals. If she, or any one else wishes to spend their lives as gossip writers, all I ask is that they try to be accurate when it's about me -- which I see turns out to be far too much to ask
3) Also in every instance, Ana is telling me how to behave, not the other way around. She is insisting that I subordinate my social life to my professional life and hassle my friends and acquaintances every time I see them when they do something with which I happen to disagree. I tell her I feel no responsibility to do this; in fact, writing about our differences strikes me as going pretty far. Yet note the irony. She works for Time, I don't, and yet she insists it's my job to confront its editor, not hers. I’m afraid I disagree, though the one time I did meet John Huey who is not my friend, I did, extremely politely and asking whether he minded discussing it, raise the issue. What's more, I never asked for Ana's opinion of what I should so, much less initiate a conversation about this.
4) Ana apologized for her behavior towards me, which ought to tell you something.
5) Gawker's entirely unsourced coverage has been demonstrated to be false by the transcript, though I've yet to see any corrections posted.
6) Amazingly, many people in the blogosphere seem to think this is important, again, with precious little concern for accuracy. Eat the Press has the conversation taking place at the Correspondent's Dinner, which I did not attend, even though my posts also appear at Huffpo and the incident's location is clearly described. I saw one blog entry lecturing me by a man named "Richard Bradley"—who, perhaps, understandably, changed his name from “Richard Blow” after writing an ghoulishly exploitative, get-rich quick book cashing on the death of John Kennedy Jr.– in which he makes two mistakes in his first two sentences, and then goes on to call me names and instruct me about the irrelevance of "MSM" as if my work for The Nation or Media Matters or as a professor at CUNY constitutes the MSM, as opposed to say The Hearst Corporation, which used to employ Mr. Bradley, back when he had a patron named "John Kennedy," (and his name was still "Richard Blow").
7) A few people have focused on the fact that, in the discussion, I appear to privilege the opinion media over "reporting." As I try to explain, when I say "in a better world,…" before being cut off, this is, I think, the way it is, rather than the way it should be—which is why I’ve written two books about the opinion media. I wish it weren’t true but I fear it is, hence the focus of my work. (This point goes over the head of the apparently un-edited writer at "Eat the Press" as well.)
8) So again, to sum up. I did not ask to have this conversation. I did not ask to have it reported on or taped. I did not demand anything of Ms. Cox or anyone else. I simply responded as best I could to her myriad accusations against me—accusations that strike me as rather hostile and hypocritical given her own position at Time. She later apologized and I accepted. When the sister-site of Ms. Cox’s former employer, Gawker misreported the incident, and provided no sources whatever—and I re-emphasize, the only people present were myself, two Observer reporters, and Ms. Cox herself--I sought to correct the record. When the Observer printed their handy transcript, it bore out my version in every single respect. Maybe I’m not the best judge of this, but I gotta say, from my end, I really don’t see the problem.
[Permalink]
View Complete Forum Topic
Latest Poynter Blogs (
See All Blogs
)
Romenesko
Poynter's Times Publishing Co. sells Governing
Al's Morning Meeting
Recommendation for Fewer PAP Screens Sure to Set Off Controversy
E-Media Tidbits
Testing CUNY's New Business Models with Adjusted Assumptions
Ask the Recruiter
How Do I Protect My Publication Rights?
The Biz Blog
Murdoch and Microsoft's Bing: A Media Marriage Made in Heaven?
NewsPay
Study: Newspapers Need to 'Shed Legacy Costs' to Capture Online Ad Spending
Transformation Tracker
Tracking the Future of Advertising
SuperVision
What Great Bosses Know about Quiet Leaders
Diversity at Work
When is Fort Hood Suspect's Faith Relevant in Media Coverage?
Shop
About Poynter
Give to Poynter
The Kennedys: America's Front Page Family
50 years in newspapers
$16.99
Buy Event Tickets
Write Your Way Into College, $149
Saturday, Dec. 9, 2009
Writing With Roy, $149
Saturday, Dec. 12, 2009
Who We Are
& What We Do
History and mission
Where is Poynter?
The Institute's location
Faculty & Staff Listings
Contact information
Poynter on the Record
Faculty in the news
Resource Center
Tips & Bibliographies
Invest in Journalism
Your gifts support Poynter's teaching and provide scholarships.
Advertise
You aim, we deliver
Reach thousands of journalists with your message on Poynter Online.
RSS
|
Podcasts
|
Mobile
|
Twitter
|
Facebook
|
Contact
|
FAQ
Guidelines
|
Corrections
|
Privacy
|
Site Map
|
Press
|
Advertise
© 1995-2009 The Poynter Institute
801 Third Street South | St. Petersburg, FL 33701
Phone (888) 769-6837 | Fax (727) 553-4680
Username
Password
Remember Me
New User? Signup Now
See All Jobs
Add Your Resume
Post Your Job
Become a Member
More media jobs