Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Young Journalists Use Facebook Ads to Reach Prospective Employers
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Poynter Forums

View Forum Post

Topic: Letters Sent to Romenesko
Date/Time: 3/6/2009 11:09:23 AM
Title: Cheap arguments
Posted By: Jim Romenesko
 
From SETH KAPLAN: Regarding Jon Stewart's attack on Rick Santelli and CNBC, consider Jon's attack in reverse: Rick Santelli argues that homeowners should not be bailed out. Jon Stewart rebuts that CNBC was completely wrong about the state of economy with a series of damning clips.

What does one have to do with the other? Jon doesn't really say. Couldn't Jon's argument be used to refute nearly anything Santelli has said or ever said? Did Santelli cheer for the other bailouts? The piece doesn't say. In fact, the piece doesn't include any clips of Santelli at all. I find Santelli's arguments to be cheap and Stewart's more of the same.

It seems that the same mainstream media that dutifully reported whatever big business had to say about the economy... has now dutifully reported whatever Jon Stewart had to say about CNBC. [Permalink]


View Complete Forum Topic

Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers
More media jobs