What Harry Potter teaches about naming killers

My colleague Al Tompkins has written about the journalistic imperative of using names whenever we can, including the names of mass murderers. To withhold those names in the hopes of not romanticizing the killer – and not inspiring demented copycats – is an abdication of responsibility by the journalist. We need to know everything we can about the people who terrorize society – and that begins with their names.

I stand with Al on that opinion and would add another layer to his argument in the form of this sidebar: Withholding the name of the killer may have the opposite of the intended effect.

My argument comes not just from the journalism tradition of naming, but from a much larger cultural tradition in which naming is seen as a source of power. We see this in the Judeo-Christian tradition and throughout Western literature, from the way God grants Adam dominion over the animal world by giving the him the power to name the animals. We see it again in a children’s story such as Rumpelstiltskin, in which the only way to foil the evil imp is to learn and then speak his name.

To name something is to own it. To name something is to exercise power over it.

He who must not be named from the Harry Potter movie (Flickr photo by Alex Light https://flic.kr/p/brT18s)

A more recent example of this effect occurs in the seven books that constitute the Harry Potter series, by J.K. Rowling. In infancy, Harry survives an attack from the most evil wizard in the world, Lord Voldemort, known widely as “the Dark Lord.” Many in the magic world will lose their lives until Harry defeats Voldemort in the end.

Throughout the seven books only Harry and the good wizard Albus Dumbledore have the courage to speak the name “Voldemort.” When they do, others cringe. He is known by them as “You Know Who” or “He Who Must Not Be Named.”

Even when the biggest story of them all emerges, the headline writers of The Daily Prophet, the primary news organ or wizards and witches, will not alter its policy of not naming: “He Who Must Not Be Named Returns.”

But Voldemort is not the Dark Lord’s real name, just a name adopted by him to enhance his power. His real name is Tom Riddle, and the moment that Harry calls him “Tom” is the moment we know that the evil wizard is doomed.

As Justin Kaplan and Anne Bernays write in The Language of Names, “New name equals new identity equals newfound power.”

To name serial killers is not to romanticize their actions or to grant them some kind of mythic status. Out of courtesy, the name of the killer need not be emphasized during those especially sensitive moments when we are writing about the lives of his victims.

While we can understand the instinct to not name – or sympathize with the stated purpose of not encouraging imitators – there is more weight to the counter-argument: that we owe it to the public to try to answer that most difficult of journalistic questions “why,” and we cannot possibly find an answer without beginning with the “who,” and the first piece of meaningful evidence of character is likely to be a name.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • MellissaKillenyko

    before I looked at the check of $8543 , I accept …that…my neighbour
    woz like they say truley earning money parttime on their apple labtop. . there
    sisters neighbour has done this 4 only 19 months and by now cleared the debts
    on their house and bourt a gorgeous Ford . visit this site C­a­s­h­d­u­t­i­e­s­.­C­O­M­

  • BernieBastinaly

    as Thelma
    explained I cannot believe that a stay at home mom can make $7420 in four weeks
    on the internet . more info here R­e­x­1­0­.­C­O­M­

  • https://www.linkedin.com/pub/laura-henze-russell/a/3a1/6a2 Laura Henze Russell

    Even more important is asking questions that will lead us to look for organic brain damage that is a contributing cause to much mental illness, as a result of derangement of biochemical and electrical processes in the brain. Forensic autopsies should include analysis of heavy metals and toxins, and screening for genetic glitches in methylation and detoxification that make one especially susceptible to them. These are common in the general population, and typically lead to physical autoimmune and neurological disease processes resulting from inflammation. However, effects can also occur in the brain. We are still in the dark ages when it comes to understanding and treating mental illness.

  • Steve Buttry

    I disagree with Roy on this, as I explained in my own blog post. But I appreciate his response, elaborating on the views in this post: http://stevebuttry.wordpress.com/2014/06/12/journalists-cite-weak-reasons-for-naming-mass-killers/