‘Persistent listener’ gets NPR to run WikiLeaks correction

NPR.org
For over a month, the radio network has repeatedly referred to the release of “thousands” of confidential State Department cables, when in fact only 1,947 are publicly available. Ombud Alicia Shepard writes: “Here’s a hat tip to Henry Norr, a San Francisco listener who frequently complains about NPR’s news coverage” and forced the WikiLeaks correction. || Romenesko Archives: SF Chronicle suspends Norr over war protest. (March 27, 2003/summary only; links are dead).
> Call it the Year of WikiLeaks, writes CJR’s Hendler

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/BillDedman BillDedman

    WikiLeaks has released all 251,287 leaked cables, and the NPR correction is incorrect. Although WikiLeaks has published only about 2,000 of the cables, it has released them all — to the Guardian, Der Spiegel, et al. If you have something secret, something private, something stolen, and you send it to three newspapers, you’ve released it.

  • http://twitter.com/zonetuto Mário
  • http://twitter.com/MatthewSchafer Matt Schafer

    Indeed, it’s worth mentioning that often the word “release” is not attributed. That is, the articles do not say to whom the release was made. A release by the website to the public? WikiLeaks’ release of the documents to the newspapers? Thus, a newspaper may say that it was referring to WikiLeaks release of all cables to its newspaper partners, but this is far from clear.

    The bottom line is that newspapers and other news media should be more careful when referring to WikiLeaks’ release of documents. At the very least, these news outlets should make clear that WikiLeaks has released less than 2,000 cables as of December 28, 2010.

    Read More: http://lippmannwouldroll.com/2010/12/28/npr-fesses-up-to-wikileaks-coverage-blunder-now-its-everyone-elses-turn/

  • http://twitter.com/MatthewSchafer Matt Schafer

    Indeed, it’s worth mentioning that often the word “release” is not attributed. That is, the articles do not say to whom the release was made. A release by the website to the public? WikiLeaks’ release of the documents to the newspapers? Thus, a newspaper may say that it was referring to WikiLeaks release of all cables to its newspaper partners, but this is far from clear.

    The bottom line is that newspapers and other news media should be more careful when referring to WikiLeaks’ release of documents. At the very least, these news outlets should make clear that WikiLeaks has released less than 2,000 cables as of December 28, 2010.

    Read More: http://lippmannwouldroll.com/2010/12/28/npr-fesses-up-to-wikileaks-coverage-blunder-now-its-everyone-elses-turn/

blog comments powered by Disqus