Newspaper Guild calls on HuffPo’s unpaid writers to withhold their work

Romenesko Misc.
A Guild release says: “In response to the Huffington Post’s refusal to compensate its thousands of writers in the wake of its $315 million merger with AOL, the Newspaper Guild has requested a meeting with company officials to discuss ways the Huffington Post might demonstrate its commitment to quality journalism. Thus far, the request has been ignored.” The full release is after the jump.

From: The Newspaper Guild-CWA
Subject: Support Huffington Post Bloggers
To:
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011, 7:44 AM

The Newspaper Guild is calling on unpaid writers of the Huffington Post to withhold their work in support of a strike launched by Visual Arts Source in response to the company’s practice or using unpaid labor. In addition, we are asking that our members and all supporters of fair and equitable compensation for journalists join us in shining a light on the unprofessional and unethical practices of this company.

Just as we would ask writers to stand fast and not cross a physical picket line, we ask that they honor this electronic picket line.

The Newspaper Guild, a 26,000-member-strong national union of media workers, is committed to fair compensation for all workers, whether they are freelance bloggers or traditional employees. We are further committed to promoting quality journalism. Working for free does not benefit workers and undermines quality journalism.

In response to the Huffington Post’s refusal to compensate its thousands of writers in the wake of its $315 million merger with AOL, the Newspaper Guild has requested a meeting with company officials to discuss ways the Huffington Post might demonstrate its commitment to quality journalism. Thus far, the request has been ignored.

Visual Arts Source, http://visualartsource.com, an art publication, represents more than 50 writers who have said they will no longer write for the Huffington Post for free and who object to a company that depends on unpaid labor for its success.

As Cherie Turner, one of the former writers, explained, “Certainly, we all have written for free for the great exposure the Huffington Post can give us, but what’s the cost? Those of us on strike feel it undermines the value of our profession and is unethical, especially in light of great profits by those at the top. We are only asking for a fair share of what we are helping to create. We are also speaking out against real journalism being run side-by-side with advertorial.

“We feel it is unethical to expect trained and qualified professionals to contribute quality content for nothing. It is unethical to cannibalize the investment of other organizations that bear the cost of compensation and other overhead without payment for the usage of their content. It is extremely unethical to not merely blur but eradicate the distinction between the independent and informed voice of news and opinion and the voice of a shill.

The Newspaper Guild and Visual Arts Source urge others to join forces and no longer contribute their labor until the following demands are met:

● A pay schedule must be proposed and steps initiated to implement it for all contributing writers and bloggers; and,

● Paid promotional material must no longer be posted alongside editorial content; a press release or exhibition catalogue essay is fundamentally different from editorial content and must be either segregated and indicated as such, or not published at all.

Four things you can do NOW, if you choose to join this effort:

● Stop providing free content to Huffington Post and let your editor know you are choosing to take this action and what your demands are if he/she would like to keep you writing for HP (see above);

● Please respond and let me know you’re on board and that we are allowed to use your name in any press materials we send out regarding this strike;

● Please pass along the names and e-mail addresses of your colleagues who contribute to the Huffington Post so that we may ask for their support;

● Send a letter to your local media op-ed section letting them know how you feel about this situation.

Thank you for your consideration in joining in these efforts. Our intent is to encourage the Huffington Post to do the right thing. We would all love to continue contributing, but only if the terms are fair and promote good, healthy journalism. This is about supporting the quality and integrity of a vehicle for progressive expression, to actually help Huffington Post succeed, but on the right terms. We call on Arianna Huffington to demonstrate her commitment to the working class she so ardently champions in her writing.

For more information see:
Facebook: “Hey Arianna, Can You Spare a Dime?” https://www.facebook.com/heyarianna?
TNG-CWA Freelance Project: http://guildfreelancers.org/gf/
TNG-CWA Free Project Coordinators:
East Coast: Lauri Lebo, laurilebo@gmail.com
West Coast: Rebecca Rosen-Lum rrosenlum@gmail.com

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/Bellonie Jack Belloni

    Sometimes you just have to tell people to kiss your ass.  In fact that is about 99% of the time.  (Maybe that is why I have so few friends. Ha.) 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GDD5IN7FABIG7WGWY6D2ZFSZXQ Bored

    good for you!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OGFG5OUKDJT63HEAYZCOZQ7B4Y al

    The real issue is the amount of hits on what is posted. For example, one post by someone with a recognizable name, not an anonymous blogger, has exactly TWO comments, from the same person (me).
    Would the pay exclude millionaire celebrities, politicians and the faaabulous dear dear friends of Arianna?

    What compensation scheme is the Guild proposing?

  • http://twitter.com/Artistlike DM Conner

    A lot of the contributing writers aren’t going to honor this “electronic picket line” because they’re not journalists to begin with; they are people with opinions who the Huffington Post has given an outlet for expression. As a (recent) former freelance writer who was ousted from my semi-regular gig by someone who contributes his opinions to a national online magazine for no compensation, both my pride as a writer and my bank account have been hit hard. But I’ve officially given up. Those who can pump out fast, controversial posts–even if they can barely string together a sentence–have inherited journalism. And they’re not going to boycott because they don’t know any better. It’s just time to accept defeat.

  • Anonymous

    I’d suspect that the Guild will soon be decertified, if not legally, then in a defacto context.

    Jobs are difficult to find in this economy and the smart journalists/writers/reporters will want to keep theirs!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JSUNTE67TUHS36QAOVMR4LC5HA Pink

    This is so frustrating to read. I could see if the Guild was supporting its own members, but that’s not the case here. Anyone who writes or blogs for HP is made aware of the process quite early and it is quite clear: No pay. Great exposure. HP provides an opportunity for nameless writers to catapult themselves into the industry if they have any talent at all. The Guild is wrong here and it is embarrassing.

  • Anonymous

    Working for free is a key feature of the “new,” or psuedo-, journalism. The HuffPo writers chose to write for free. That is the value they put on their work. They chose to be used and don’t deserve a penny.

    Wayne Myers

  • Anonymous

    This is wonderful! HuffPo makes hundreds of millions of dollars and CAN’T pay the people/writers who make it work . . . .This absurdity needs to stop. I’m 100% on board. Pay your writers, Arianna, like you pay the people who clean your mansion or cook the food you eat!

  • Anonymous

    ” … ways the Huffington Post might demonstrate its commitment to quality journalism.”

    That would perpetuate the absurd notion that the Huffington Post is an actual news organization. Besides, why would HuffPo’s writers require compensation as the result of a merger? They ought to be paid what they agreed to accept for their work. If that happens to be nothing, then there really isn’t anything to dispute.