Study of iPad users identifies obstacles for Murdoch’s The Daily

Romenesko Misc.
The obstacles identified by iPad users surveyed by media research firm knowDigital “include the perception among those with the greatest interest in news that The Daily’s content is lacking, that superior content is available elsewhere online for free and the expectation that apps are purchased through one-time transactions, as opposed to the recurring subscription model The Daily employs.” (Read the PDF report.) The release is after the jump.

Press release

NEW STUDY OF IPAD USERS IDENTIFIES OBSTACLES FOR THE DAILY

Media Research Firm knowDigital Releases First Research Study on News Corporation’s iPad Application

LAFAYETTE HILL, PA, March 30, 2011 – To attract a large number of users and generate substantial subscription revenue, The Daily – the news-based application released by News Corporation in February exclusively for Apple’s iPad™ platform – will need to overcome a few obstacles with iPad owners who consume news online. These obstacles include the perception among those with the greatest interest in news that The Daily’s content is lacking, that superior content is available elsewhere online for free and the expectation that apps are purchased through one-time transactions, as opposed to the recurring subscription model The Daily employs. Identifying these obstacles comprises the major finding of research on The Daily released today by knowDigital, which funded and independently completed the study. A report detailing this and other key findings is now available for free download [PDF] from the company’s website.

“Our research finds that iPad users feel positively about what News Corporation has set out to accomplish with The Daily,” said knowDigital President Sam Milkman, who authored the report. “However, for News Corporation to convert those positive impressions into regular use and paid subscriptions from iPad users, it is going to have to address a number of concerns raised in our study.”

knowDigital completed the study, “Real iPad Users’ Early Reaction to The Daily,” with 25- to 54-year-old iPad owners who consumed electronic news multiple times each week. These consumers participated in one-on-one, 30-minute interviews with knowDigital personnel following two weeks of regular usage of The Daily.

The study revealed how consumers generally fell into two camps—one consisting of tech-savvy, heavy news users and one consisting of those who are less tech-savvy and have lower interest in gathering news content. It is with this second group that The Daily performed better, as the heavy news users in the first group—while appreciating the technical features of The Daily—dismissed much of the app’s content, expressing the nearly universal perception that more compelling and in-depth news content is available elsewhere online for no charge. iPad users in both camps were generally unwilling to commit to purchasing subscriptions to The Daily for a number of reasons, including some based on their specific perceptions of The Daily and some based on the idea of paying for an app on a recurring charge basis.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XML34CIZ5NUF5WY6AIRAMO4HBE Jeffrey

    I subscribed for a year–on the first day….and I regret that decision.
    Not enough unique news…The Times of London and the New York Post do it so much better.
    Sports coverage——a “results” page would be so much better than the slow ticker they have now.

  • http://twitter.com/BrianMB9 Brian Balkus

    The content is weak. Extremely weak. Why do I want to pay $40 bucks a year for shallow sports,gossip, and news reporting when ESPN, TMZ, and the Washington Post are free? Who is the target audience for this thing? I don’t get it.

  • Anonymous

    I really enjoy the audio articles. To me, solid content that is read to me would be worth something. However, it needs to be all of the content. The whole purpose of electronic distribution (in my mind) is to be interactive and efficient. Consuming content while doing something else in he background is appealing and would be worth opening my wallet. Otherwise, it’s just another form of typical news formatted differently and without ink,

  • http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/04/this-week-in-review-navigating-the-times-pay-plan-loopholes-1-for-social-search-and-innovation-ideas/ This Week in Review: Navigating the Times’ pay-plan loopholes, +1 for social search, and innovation ideas » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

    [...] said it was downloaded 500,000 times during its trial period and has 70,000 regular users, and a study was conducted finding that it’s more popular with less tech-savvy, less content-concerned [...]

  • http://twitter.com/ImperiousRix Ricardo Gonzalez

    The Daily was always going to have to be something unique in order to gain an audience, and although I think it has potential, I think they may overestimate people’s willingness to shell out money for what can be found online for free.

blog comments powered by Disqus