Starkman: ProPublica’s Pulitzer shows that news orgs should examine financial meltdown

CJR
In noting that The Wall Street Journal didn’t win a Pulitzer for its series on online privacy, yet ProPublica won for digging into the roots of the financial crisis, Dean Starkman says this is the lesson: News orgs shouldn’t have dropped the story of the financial meltdown. “I wonder if the Pulitzer jurors and board feel as I do, that we’re still in about the third inning of this profound and historic event and its aftermath. The virtuosity of [ProPublica's work] aside … perhaps the best thing about it was that they decided to keep after the story after others had foolishly moved on. I always thought that was nuts, especially if you have the words ‘Wall Street’ in your name.” || Related: Other investigative outfits need your donations more than ProPublica.
> Does this memo mean WSJ was snubbed by Pulitzer board again?

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=628233825 Trevor Butterworth

    Blah, blah, blah. Congrats to the winners by the way, the focus of my ennui is Mr. Starkman’s moralizing – not your journalism. If you think the recent problems in cloud security don’t present unprecedented and profound financial risks, you’re not paying attention to the next financial meltdown.