Stelter: In Joplin, ‘my best reporting was on Twitter’

…the Deadline
The New York Times’ Brian Stelter has blogged about his experience covering the tornado destruction in Joplin, Mo. — the first time he’s reported on a natural disaster. Expecting to go to Chicago to interview Oprah Winfrey, he arrived ill-prepared, without boots, maps, or a pen for his notebook. “What I learned: always carry extra pens.” Stelter ended up tweeting much of what he saw; he used Instagram to send photos, which helped him remember scenes for his stories. At his suggestion, the Times linked to his tweets on its home page. “It was, after all, the place where my latest reporting was being posted. … Looking back, I think my best reporting was on Twitter. … People later told me that they thought I was processing what I was seeing in real-time on Twitter. I was.” He archived his tweets on his Tumblr.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6OQ6LTNM5LPX4BXR4MYBFTPFXE Thomas

    Brian Stetler is being evangelical about Twitter. Fine. But don’t try to pass off this grab-bag of links and OMGs as great reporting. If this Brian Stetler thinks this is his best reporting, that’s said for him and the Times. I don’t think Stetler believes it. It just fits the message about media he’s into.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=628233825 Trevor Butterworth

    Aside from all the other criticisms of how technology “saved” a reporter who forgot his pen, one additional point worth considering is that the linguistic style of tweet-reporting, which is to say, staccato bursts of information, may be a major turn off for female readers, based on the linguistic research done on gender differences in IM and text messaging style.

  • Anonymous

    I just read the archived tweets. It may be reporting, but it’s obviously doing more for him than me — it’s not useful to read half-digested notes. I don’t have the time for it, and it’s not telling me anything I don’t already know. You’ve got to dig. A quote like “the sheer size of the destruction is just amazing” is just inane, and it would not find its way into my story. Yet here I am reading it — and many similar ones — on Twitter.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bradleyfikes Bradley J. Fikes

    Every newsroom should read these suggestions to covering disasters. I’m sending this to my editors.