Jarvis: News articles sometimes a ‘luxury’ for stories already covered live

Buzzmachine
Jeff Jarvis looks at recent demonstrations of live news coverage, such as Brian Stelter’s tweets from Joplin, Mo., and Andy Carvin’s tweets documenting the Arab Spring, and wonders whether they show that articles are sometimes “a value-added luxury” or a “byproduct of the process.” After describing the benefits of news articles (context, multiple perspectives) he writes: “They are no longer necessary for every event. They were a necessary form for newspapers and news shows but not the free flow, the never-starting, never-ending stream of digital.” || On the other hand: Mathew Ingram of GigaOM says all those tweets can be overwhelming and increases the need for a packaged approach. || Not buying it: A commenter reads Stelter’s tweets and concludes, “It’s not useful to read half-digested notes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/aoscruggs aoscruggs

    Some folks aren’t on #twitter for news. News articles can be more efficient than scrolling thru #tweets

  • http://twitter.com/staceyresnikoff Stacey Resnikoff

    @font-face {
    font-family: “Cambria”;
    }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

    @font-face {
    font-family: “Cambria”;
    }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }

    Live-blogging by insightful journalists can provide instant
    context. Reporter = News Outlet. However, live-blogging as a term might best be
    defined as a series of (questionable) facts. An article (or
    post-live-tweetspree follow-up piece) by the insightful journalist is still
    welcome and desired in the marketplace – perhaps even longer form, perhaps even
    a book (make that eBook). Let’s hope the future of news is survival of the fittest
    – meaning the smartest/most thoughtful, not simply the fastest or best spun. With
    the ever-increasing speed of reporting, those who are reflective in real-time
    will have a real edge: “This is what I see, and this is what it means.” But
    also, those with the inner wisdom to know when to step away from the device and
    truly experience the experience in order to write about it later are crucial to
    our culture. Hopefully, we will continue to reward those who dive deep, because
    if everyone is live-blogging “here’s what’s happening, not sure what to think,”
    when does anyone understand?

  • Anonymous

    Is there any way to read only comments, and not that incessant Twitter feed?

  • http://www.poynter.org Poynter

    What do you mean?

    Steve Myers

  • http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/06/is-twitter-writing-or-is-it-speech-why-we-need-a-new-paradigm-for-our-social-media-platforms/ Is Twitter writing, or is it speech? Why we need a new paradigm for our social media platforms » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

    [...] reporting tool. The pseudo-enabler of democratic revolution. The existential threat to the narrative primacy of the news article. [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus