Shirky: News has to be subsidized, cheap, and free

Shirky.com
Media theorist Clay Shirky has written a sequel, of sorts, to his 2009 blog post, “Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable.” In that post, Shirky declared:

“There is no general model for newspapers to replace the one the Internet just broke. … That is what real revolutions are like. The old stuff gets broken faster than the new stuff is put in its place. The importance of any given experiment isn’t apparent at the moment it appears; big changes stall, small changes spread. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen.”

Today’s post picks up the same theme. “This is the crisis, right now,” Shirky writes. But he proposes a path through uncertainty: “Any way of creating news that gets cost below income, however odd, is a good way, and any way that doesn’t, however hallowed, is bad.” As he prepares to teach in NYU’s journalism program, Shirky says “there are only three things I’m sure of: News has to be subsidized, and it has to be cheap, and it has to be free.”

News has to be subsidized because society’s truth-tellers can’t be supported by what their work would fetch on the open market. … Most people don’t care about the news, and most of the people who do don’t care enough to pay for it…

News has to be cheap because cheap is where the opportunity is right now. … If for-profit revenue is shrinking and non-profit funding won’t make up the shortfall, we need much cheaper ways of gathering, understanding, and disseminating news, whether measured in information produced or readers served.

And news has to be free, because it has to spread. The few people who care about the news need to be able to share it with one another and, in times of crisis, to sound the alarm for the rest of us.”

No single business model will work universally, he says. And the danger of having only media responsible for reporting has created “a single point of failure.” The solution, he suggests, is the chaos of multiple competing approaches.

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    I think what he meant to say was, “‘News has to be cheap,’ because I get a ton of money advising companies to cut other peoples” salaries. Shirky doesn’t understand anything about media – he wrote a whole book about how the Internet is thriving because people are watching less TV – at a time when ratings aren’t declining. The entire book is based on a false assumption – it’s just dead wrong. He’s all bluster and no facts. Too bad for the students at NYU – they deserve better than the Skirky and Rosen Clown Show.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=628233825 Trevor Butterworth

    So, after years of theorizing about the media, it boils down to income must exceed expenditure. This is such a Derek Zoolander moment…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504633504 Dan Mitchell

    Is that really all Shirky said here? Maybe I read the wrong post. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=628233825 Trevor Butterworth

    That’s the premise upon which cheap must square with free. Minus the waffle.

blog comments powered by Disqus