Garry Trudeau calls Joe McGinniss’s book ‘meticulously reported’

Washington Post
“Doonesbury” creator Garry Trudeau confirms to Michael Cavna that Roland Hedley’s readings from a Sarah Palin tell-all were indeed actual excerpts from Joe McGinniss’s forthcoming bio, ”The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin.” Cavna points out that newspaper editors across America knew that Trudeau was going to write in his strip that Palin and ex-NBA star Glen Rice “once had a romantic encounter,” but the journalists kept quiet because of an embargo. (Meanwhile, the National Enquirer beat them on the story.) “As silly as it may sound,” writes Cavna, “you — as a subscribing comic-feature client — are expected to respect an embargo on such information, whether you care one whit about the salacious/irrelevant/enlightening/boring tale or not.”

A Chicago Tribune editor was apparently referring to today’s Palin-Rice strip when he said earlier this week that “the storyline begins slowly, but as the week progresses, the remarks become increasingly serious.” || Read Janet Maslin’s NYT review of McGinniss’s book, and The Daily Beast’s “6 juiciest leaks” from it.
> Earlier: Miami Herald staffers debate posting of Palin-Rice tryst story

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    And by the way, big chunks of the “Lamestream Media” not only refused to run the cartoon, but are also overwhelmingly panning the book as thinly sourced, sensationalistic drivel. I mean, speaking of “reality.”

  • Anonymous

    Can you add a few more cut-n-paste talking points to this, Polly? You didn’t even mention Soros.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/BQ7JX5BODUMWCURFUZSKKHQ4CE Charles S

    I just love to see over and over again, the liberals and the hypocrisy they revel in. They use unrealiable sources, and smear tactics to hit those they hate. And you can always tell who that hate by the sheer volume of the vitrolic reheotric they spew.  Sickening and disgusting, but for a liberal….it is a way of life.

  • Anonymous

    Doonesbury’s 15 YEARS was up a long,long,time ago.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FZXI65M3RJ2YKGU5FWEO2NY2Q4 Bruce

    Ever notice that the more horrible the things the authors write about, the better the book sells. There is more money in smear books than telling the truth. Thats all.

  • Anonymous

    All you need to know is that Garry Trudeau thinks that McGinniss’s book is “meticulously reported.”  Aside from belonging in the “Fantasy Fiction” section of your local library, one can know that McGinniss is a character assassin who is in the same league as Trudeau.  You can pretty much take it to the bank that so-called authors and cartoonists of their stripe are not interested in actual truth; they engage in political smears and untruths, depending on the Lamestream Media to cover for their “journalistic” malpractice.  McGinniss and Trudeau are so twentieth century anyway . . . best to let them continue living their self-righteous lives in their little cocoons far from reality.

  • Anonymous

    All you need to know is that Garry Trudeau thinks that McGinniss’s book is “meticulously reported.”  Aside from belonging in the “Fantasy Fiction” section of your local library, one can know that McGinniss is a character assassin who is in the same league as Trudeau.  You can pretty much take it to the bank that so-called authors and cartoonists of their stripe are not interested in actual truth; they engage in political smears and untruths, depending on the Lamestream Media to cover for their “journalistic” malpractice.  McGinniss and Trudeau are so twentieth century anyway . . . best to let them continue living their self-righteous lives in their little cocoons far from reality.

  • Anonymous

    People on the left need to realize “Doonesbury” isn’t as universally read and liked as they think it is. Trudeau’s “use-by” date expired a long time ago.

  • Anonymous

    People on the left need to realize “Doonesbury” isn’t as universally read and liked as they think it is. Trudeau’s “use-by” date expired a long time ago.

  • Anonymous

    Just because the comments were taken from McGinnis’s book, doesn’t make them true.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504633504 Dan Mitchell

    God forbid a reviewer should be opinionated. 

    She cites several examples from the book to illustrate her points. Those examples, even without Maslin’s commentary on them, suggest that this book wasn’t written to illuminate anything, but merely to attack Palin and, of course, to bring attention and money to Joe McGinniss. We all already know Palin is awful (excepting those who have fooled themselves into thinking otherwise). The only revelations here seem to be gossipy, sensational ones based on the allegations of unnamed sources. 

    Funny how Trudeau declares the book to be “meticulously reported,” even as the book itself seems to own up to not being meticulously reported at all. As loopy as the Tribune’s action was in yanking Doonesbury this week, the worst scandal might be Trudeau basically turning the strip over to McGinniss. It’s emblematic of why the strip has gotten so flaccid over the years: he used to put the funny first, and the point-making second. When it’s the other way around, it doesn’t work. (See: Dennis Miller). Are these strips good Doonesbury strips? Nope, not at all.

  • http://twitter.com/MarkGisleson Mark Gisleson

    I read Maslin’s review this morning and it was a remarkable exercise in some kind of weird establishmentarian negativity. Every allegation was about an old crime that was old news (unless you get all your news from the mainstream media in which case it was all new news). Maslin attacked McGinniss’s style, but not his substance.

    I’ve been very conflicted about Maslin over the years, but she’s finally pushed me into the anti-Maslin camp. She is as arbitrarily opinionated as any of the authors she’s eviscerated.

    I also read McGinniss’s blog, and he can be very hard to take at times. Self-serving would be the least of it, but nothing in excess of what Maslin exhibits in her anti-McGinniss review.