Johann Hari blames plagiarism on ignorance, pledges to post audio of all interviews in the future

The Independent | Guardian | Forbes
Johann Hari, a columnist for The Independent, will take four months of unpaid leave, return a journalism prize and undergo journalism training after admitting to plagiarizing material from the published works of people he interviewed and editing Wikipedia entries of people in “juvenile or malicious” ways (e.g. labeling people homophobic, drunks and anti-Semites). Hari blames the plagiarism on ignorance, saying he substituted muddled interviews with published work to best represent what the interviewee thought. In the future, he’ll footnote all his articles and publish audio of all interviews. Forbes’ Jeff Bercovici writes that Hari’s claim of ignorance is the most unforgivable: “Because he ‘rose very fast in journalism straight from university,’ he never had a chance to learn that making it look like someone said something to you that they actually said to someone else is wrong. … Journalism is filled with people who rose fast and/or received no formal training. Most of us … never had to be told you can’t steal quotes.” || Related: Have newsrooms relaxed standards, sanctions for fabrication and plagiarism?

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5300451 Ryan Holeywell

    This is a cop out. He understood the rules. His meteoric rise didn’t prevent him from knowing the rules. 

  • Glenn Fleishman

    Hari is perpetuating the same kind of semi-charming, semi-belligerent nonsense that was his stock in trade. He engaged in premeditated, long-duration repeated acts that he now identifies, months after being called out, as wrong. They are wrong to him because he was caught, and now must determine how best to issue mild contrition in the form of non-apology, and continue down the same path. After his “retraining,” he will likely be found out again, because this is a condition of how he works, not a problem of knowing the ropes.

    His editors’ culpability isn’t mentioned at all. They must have had signs over the years. Too perfect quotes are obviously too perfect. And the interview subjects must never have minded because apparently none reported that they hadn’t said in an interview what he’d quoted.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lancecollinsgay Edward Allen

    Bullshit. They teach you first thing in journalism classes not to make up quotes. You can alter grammar if you wish, but you should not take someone’s quote out of context. I know. I learned the hard way and did it once.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lancecollinsgay Edward Allen

    Bullshit. They teach you first thing in journalism classes not to make up quotes. You can alter grammar if you wish, but you should not take someone’s quote out of context. I know. I learned the hard way and did it once.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lancecollinsgay Edward Allen

    Got my head chewed off.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lancecollinsgay Edward Allen

    Got my head chewed off.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2ZSN5GA3LBQ5BD6SQYN5IL4CFM Pat Mustafa

    British journalism

  • http://www.facebook.com/wayne.myers Wayne Myers

    Another “star” of the New Journalism.  The maxim “the story is not about you” has been largely forgotten, so should we really be surprised at revelations such as this?

  • Anonymous

    Should newspapers and other media conduct regular training sessions — especially for new hires — to make sure reporters know and understand what plagiarism is? There have been too many cases lately where plagiarists’ explanations have amounted to: “hey, I didn’t know it was wrong until somebody told me.”

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know that it takes “training” to know that it’s wrong to plagiarize. This guy is a Blair-like sociopath, case closed.

blog comments powered by Disqus