WSJ Asia moves more than half of its copies through heavy discounting, like WSJ Europe

Hong Kong Audit Bureau of Circulations
Responding to one of our posts about The Wall Street Journal Europe’s use of bulk sales to, well, bulk up its circulation, a commenter questioned whether The Wall Street Journal Asia employs a similar strategy. Apparently so. Heavily discounted copies account for about the same share of circulation for both editions of the Journal. For the first half of 2011, The Wall Street Journal Asia reported an average circulation of 69,932, of which 43,585 — or 62 percent — was bulk sales. For the Europe edition, that figure is about 61 percent. The circulation reports indicate that the Asia Journal has increased its bulk sales as its overall circulation has fallen in the past couple of years. And when I say “heavily discounted,” I mean heavily discounted: About 40 percent of the bulk sales of the Asian edition cost less than 5 percent of the cover price. So if the cover price were $2.30 US, as it was in 2010, then half of the bulk sales would have been for a price of 12 cents per issue. || Related: Frédéric Filloux says the “ecosystem of cheating” in print circulation has its counterpart on the WebThree UK papers “are still hooked on the bulk sales drug,” including The Independent: about 43 percent of its total circulation is bulk sales (paidContent.org) || Earlier: Like WSJ Europe, some US papers rely on deeply-discounted circulation (Poynter.org)

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/IraStoll Ira Stoll

    The linked-to-article here from PaidContent.org includes the following link: “ABC (NYSE: DIS)” That could be a consequence of allowing some computer program or robot to stand in for an alert, human editor in placing hyperlinks. Or it could be the consequence of a non-alert, human editor. The Audit Bureau of Circulation, unlike the American Broadcasting Company, is not a unit of Disney.

  • Anonymous

    It’s funny, as these charges against News Corp. continue to add to what is becoming a giant pile, we’re no longer seeing the Murdoch apologists in here trying to make their “few bad apples” arguments. 

  • Reykjavik

    You’re barking up the wrong tree on this. Most international editions of US publications have the same strategy, and it’s well-known and understood by advertisers, who are the only ones who matter here. Check out some of the major weekly magazines.

  • http://www.poynter.org Poynter

    @twitter-27897166:disqus I believe those are automated links, and the computer system must think that ABC always means American Broadcasting Co.

    Steve Myers
    Poynter.org

  • Anonymous

    Why don’t you investigate what the FT does.  Unless they tell you, you won’t find out by looking at their circulation statements, as they are audited under UK circ rules which don’t force you to disclose bulk, like the U.S. and international rules.

    Advertisers aren’t stupid.  They use syndicated reserach, like the EBRS and ABRS surveys anyway, to determine readership, rather than claimed circ figures.

  • Anonymous

    Why don’t you investigate what the FT does.  Unless they tell you, you won’t find out by looking at their circulation statements, as they are audited under UK circ rules which don’t force you to disclose bulk, like the U.S. and international rules.

    Advertisers aren’t stupid.  They use syndicated reserach, like the EBRS and ABRS surveys anyway, to determine readership, rather than claimed circ figures.

blog comments powered by Disqus