Media treat presidential campaigns like a game show

Roll Call
Presidential candidate debates, writes Stuart Rothenberg, “have become a form of reality TV, with moderators and political reporters looking for intriguing storylines to attract more viewers and to force more confrontation among the candidates.” Rothenberg argues that the problem with this approach is that debates reward characteristics that aren’t necessarily the ones that help someone govern. “The presidency isn’t a game show, no matter how much some in the media treat it that way.” || Related:Many critics have singled out the September CNN debate as being especially reminiscent of a reality show.” (Poynter.org) | Howard Kurtz describes how Fox News staffers “plotted how to trap the candidates” in September debate (The Daily Beast) | “Debates, now growing in number, are having an impact on the media narrative, perhaps because the candidates find themselves in less scripted encounters during these events.” (PEJ) | Cain a no-show for New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board meeting (msnbc.com)

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    Back in the 60s Mad Magazine ran a satire called “If the president were chosen like Miss America.” It was funny and ridiculous at the same time.  And it was eerily similar to what passes for televised debates and election campaigns today.