Lessons from Truth Goggles: ‘Trying to tell people what to think is a losing battle’

Slifty.com
MIT grad student Dan Schultz shares some lessons from his effort to create virtual “Truth Goggles” — a browser plugin that shows a user “what is true and what is false on the web site you are viewing.”

The three big ones, boiled down from his 145-page thesis:

  • “When people consume information they are struggling hard to maintain their identity. That’s all there is to it. There is plenty of evidence that people consume information with ideological motivations. Those motivations often cause them to accept or reject information based on how well it aligns with what they already believe. …”
  • “Trying to tell people what to think is a losing battle. … There is no way to create a universally respected system that also tells people what to think. I changed course and settled for a system that would remind people when to think instead. I think that is a better mission anyway.”
  • “Credibility breeds respect, and respect breeds open minds. Several participants in the Truth Goggles user study commented that having a credibility layer made them more willing to consider perspectives and messages that they might have normally ignored completely.”

Earlier: 5 projects that take different approaches to promote fact-checking (Poynter) | Introducing Truth Goggles (Slifty.com)

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.