Is Pinterest ‘a dud’ for news publishers?

Digiday | The Motley Fool
News publishers have been experimenting with the fast-growing, image-curation network Pinterest to see what value it might deliver. Referral data aggregated by Shareaholic from 200,000 websites shows Pinterest driving 1.19 percent of visits, growing steadily each month and exceeding Twitter and StumbleUpon referrals.

But Pinterest’s growth trend has been cooling, and Josh Sternberg writes that “for many news publishers, which often tend to judge social platforms by the hard metric of traffic referrals, Pinterest is a dud.” The highly social Atlantic and BuzzFeed websites say it’s not a big factor, Sternberg reports, and The New York Times says social referrals of all types account for less than 5 percent of its traffic.

“This comes back to how people use Pinterest,” Sternberg says. “It’s not a site for discovering or sharing textual content, which is the business that The Atlantic, the NYT and many other news publishers are in.” Niche magazines that focus on visual content and female audiences are seeing better results.

Earlier: Journalism professors find uses for Pinterest (Poynter) | Recipes, vertical photos shared most on Pinterest (Poynter).

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/ohnostudio Libby Stack

    If you publish stories about Chocolate Covered Bacon, the 10 Best Pairs of Wedding Shoes, hot dresses for clubbing, the top 23 lipstick shades – you’ll get that traffic. And oh yes, you’ll have to provide images of all the shoes, etc so they can snatch them for their pinboards. You have to take into account the web demographic that lives on pinterest – they’re not exactly interested in reading. Some are barely literate. The sad truth.