Presidential debates honcho: ‘Very hard to find’ good moderators

The Washington Post | CBS News | The Huffington Post
| McClatchy
Earlier this week, three New Jersey high school students tried to drop off a petition asking the Commission on Presidential Debates to appoint a woman to moderate one of this fall’s presidential debates. Building security didn’t let them in the Washington, D.C. headquarters.

The body’s executive director, Janet Brown, tells former Washington Post reporter Annie Groer that the students didn’t make an appointment. Curiously, she didn’t quite say it that way to CBS News’ Leigh Ann Caldwell, who interviewed her before the students showed up:

Brown also says she’s unsure if she will meet with the teens Tuesday, but [petitioner Sammi] Siegal said they have been guaranteed a meeting with at least a staff member.

Brown also told Groer that great debate moderators don’t grow on trees:

Each debate will cover six topics lasting 15 minutes, picked by the moderator and announced ahead of time. That places a big burden on the moderator to use the time wisely to craft a good exchange. You can lob up names of accomplished journalists ‘til the cows come home, but it’s very hard to find someone who can do that.

If only there were some sort of organization that identified and developed journalists who feel comfortable in front of cameras!

One person Brown does have faith in is Jim Lehrer, who’s moderated eight presidential debates and one vice-presidential debate since the last time a woman soloed as moderator. That was in 1992, when Carole Simpson held down a town hall in Richmond, Va.

Simpson told The Huffington Post that the gig didn’t give her much leeway in crafting good exchanges:

“I was told in my earpiece by a producer, ‘Go interview the lady in the green dress on the left, and now the man in the red sweater.’ I had no control over the questions that were asked, or who asked, or in what order. I was like a traffic cop.

Lehrer compared being asked to moderate a debate to being drafted:

“Sheer public service,” he called it, never mind that he has said he’d never do another one.

With no disrespect intended to one of the finest broadcast journalists this nation has produced, if the answer to the debate commission’s question is so often “Jim Lehrer,” couldn’t its query stand some review?

Debate moderators will be announced this month. Journalism prof Alan Schroeder told McClatchy’s Kaz Komolafe he thinks the petition will contribute to the commission choosing a female moderator. Will it be one of these 15 women?

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=586193400 Robb Hill

    The “debates” are a joke. There hasn’t been an actual debate of ideas and policy since John Adams. This election, because of the increased polarization of the parties, is more about philosophical ideas than any election since the 1920s. The upcoming debates don’t need a journalist they need a philosophy professor. Michael Sandal would be a good prospect. Anyone who can actually get the candidates to get to the core of their beliefs and why is what’s needed. This country doesn’t need another 60 minutes if gently probing questions with softball answers.

  • Anonymous

    I think you give a clue to why it is so hard to find a “good” moderator in Ms. Simpson’s statement.

    It is hard to find someone who appears to be challenging the participants yet is following a script the whole time. Unfortunately, almost all journalists who are interested in actually informing people work outside the beltway bubble and thus are automatically excluded by the MSM.

  • Anonymous

    I think you give a clue to why it is so hard to find a “good” moderator in Ms. Simpson’s statement.

    It is hard to find someone who appears to be challenging the participants yet is following a script the whole time. Unfortunately, almost all journalists who are interested in actually informing people work outside the beltway bubble and thus are automatically excluded by the MSM.