USA Today unveils new redesign

USA Today | García Media | Editor & Publisher

“We are reclaiming our leadership in visual storytelling with a new brand identity that’s as dynamic as the news itself, that’s an expression of our editorial voice, and vice versa.” I have no idea what that sentence means, but it’s part of how USA Today explains its redesign, which launches Friday, in this video.


USA Today shows off what the front page will look like in a story that also says the organization “will increase the amount of original reporting in its pages and host more videos produced by the more than 5,000 journalists at USA TODAY and other Gannett properties.”
That dot’s got a lot of work to do in the new design:

USA TODAY’s new logo — a large circle in colors corresponding to to the sections — will be an infographic that changes with the news, containing a photo or image that represents key stories of the day.

Mario García writes about how USA Today’s news briefs and riot of color were regarded with equal parts fascination and revulsion in many newsrooms after the newspaper’s 1982 launch.

I cannot tell you how many times in my career post-1982 I have heard both editors and readers tell me: I do not want this newspaper to turn into another fluffy USA TODAY.
Each time I would be the reassuring father: Don’t worry, we will not replicate USA TODAY.
And in our next workshop, we would be discussing section color coding, more briefs, and better utilization of graphics.

The paper’s iconic weather page will “sport a cleaner look,” USA Today says. Former Poynter visual faculty member George Rorick designed the original page, which used color and kicky graphics. In a 2004 interview as he retired, Rorick talked about the development of the page, the “flaps” he built by hand to separate colors and the unexpected rock-star status the page bestowed on him:

It got to be embarrassing the first two years. I really mean it, it was embarrassing. TV cameras would come in to interview people at USA Today, and then they’d come to the art department and say they’d want to see the guy who did the weather. And all of the other artists (would have) really long faces.

John K. Hartman has written two books about USA Today; in an essay on Editor & Publisher he predicts “USA Today will be shuttered in the next three years.” He has assembled a rather dunning list of what he sees as the paper’s challenges and opportunities. Its original audience has moved on, Hartman writes, but the paper still might be able to become a conversation-starter. One sample suggestion:

Hire some top newspaper and magazine columnists, and add celebrities and TV personalities; feature four of them per day. All of a sudden, you will be leading the discussion in the country instead of following it. Elevate USA Today columnists Craig Wilson and Chris Brennan, and hire outside for the rest. Move news summaries to the
second page.

As it happens, Christine Haughney writes top columnist Michael Wolff will write a weekly media column for USA Today.

He also notes the paper’s “colorful blue logo shows up very nicely on a computer screen in a public place.”

Here’s the full text of the video:

The USA Is a place filled with innovators, moviemakers, record-breakers, rock ‘n’ rollers, impossible dreamers. USA Today is a forum for understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation. We are USA Today. We are not from a particular city — or a particular worldview. Our vision is broader, and we’re here to help Americans do their thing — whatever that might be. We’re connecting them to the stories they care about — not only telling, but showing. And providing tools that let our readers take action. The U.S. is a set of ideas, stories, beliefs that are being discussed and revised daily. Welcome to the innovative essential news source for the USA Today — and tomorrow. We are reclaiming our leadership in visual storytelling with a new brand identity that’s as dynamic as the news itself, that’s an expression of our editorial voice, and vice versa. We’re producing content that reflects the shared American experience, spirit and conversation. In the end our product is not paper or silicon — our products are understanding and utility. At USA Today we’re not trying to bring an imaginary America to life; we’re trying to help Americans live the life they’ve always imagined. USA Today: Join the nation’s conversation.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    did you know the Big BLUE DOT on cover page USA DAY , same size and icon used by National Inquirer for many years as its LUCKY CHARM, with nat Inq if you rub the blue dot, you will have good luckthey told readers? DID USA TODAY steal this?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=749911534 Anonymous

    I was, as usual, wrong. Eating fermented dofu pie here in Taiwan. USA TODAY wrote to me just now and said Dear Danny, that date was for July 9, 2012, when we were testing out the design on templates. So it was written at 07.09.12….. the day for the first new issue of Sept. 14 reads 09.14.12 so nothing to worry about. Cheers, USA TODAY people

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=749911534 Anonymous

    I love the new design. I was there the day it launched in 1982, and have followed it since. However, one thing: the DATE code on the demo is written as ”07.09.12” and I am assuming that is meant to mean Sept. 7, 2012, right? But in USA, don’t we do the dates as MONTH DAY YEAR so it should be 09.07.12, no? Or I am seeing things?

  • Anonymous

    I was excited to see what they came up with until I opened the paper. The section fronts are interesting and colorful, however, the design falls flat on its face on the inside. There are MANY, many inside pages without color. I don’t know if this is due to a regional printing issue or what. The lack of color and teeny, tiny little fonts on section fronts and parts of inside pages makes it nearly unreadable (I’m only 39, and my eyes aren’t that terrible.)

    It is a different design, which is in some ways good, but it’s overall, it’s not an improvement, which should be the point.

  • http://bleacherreport.com/users/535519-nick-p nick price

    good redesign for USA Today

  • http://www.ktvz.com Barney Lerten

    It’s not that ‘Back to the Future’ design, but probably better in many ways – more open. Always have enjoyed USAT – their mobile app is among my favorites/most used — will be interesting to see how it translates across devices.