Cycling magazine editor regrets not covering doping

PressGazette
Andy Sutcliffe left Britain’s Cycling Weekly the year before Lance Armstrong began his stretch of Tour de France victories; nonetheless he said in a radio interview that doping was a “well-known open secret for decades and decades and decades.” Armstrong “has no place in cycling,” International Cycling Union President Pat McQuaid said at a conference Monday announcing it won’t fight the decision to strip the Texan of his seven Tour titles.

Asked if he had any regrets about not speaking up sooner, Sutcliffe said: “100 per cent. I thought long and hard about doing this interview and I suppose it’s an element of a mea culpa on my behalf. And if other people won’t admit it it’s a mea culpa on their behalf.”


Sutcliffe said when he started at Cycling Weekly, riders and others told him “how dope tests could be got around, who was complicit in this sort of cover up. And I think that cover up went on and perhaps to some extent is still going on.”

He added: “I’ve been very surprised by some of the reactions of people saying they don’t know. I cannot believe that as editor of Cycling Weekly and then editor-in-chief of the main cycling mags in the UK that I was the only on who had any insight into this – it seems incredibly unlikely.”

Related: Armstrong “set a precedent for other athletes who would go on to use gorilla tactics to attempt to intimidate the media or silence accusers” | Sunday Times journalist David Walsh on his pursuit of Armstrong

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    If doping has “no place” in cycling, then how will the controlling bodies of this two-wheeled sport now determine that the second or third place peddlers weren’t also stoked without the same amount of legal scrutiny?

    If the American doping regulator is dependent upon its revenue from a line-item in the federal budget – it should be eliminated!

    If the willful action of a peddler is so egregious that they should be banned while having all their previous Tour titles (actually the former winner’s property) stricken from the record, then the DEA should first be investigating his/her actions as a criminal violation. The burden being put directly on the Congress to create the legal framework for criminal enforcement and the law enforcement agency’s funding. The legal penalties should also include jail.

    Otherwise, all professional athletes should be able to stoke up on the performance enhancers until their heads explode, their biceps rupture, or they throw their arm completely off their bodies! Afford them the same opportunity at death as the typical NASCAR driver is afforded.

    Then the downhill stage for the Tour in the Alps will become more exciting and even more spectators with a death-glint will be attracted.

  • Anonymous

    “He added: “I’ve been very surprised by some of the
    reactions of people saying they don’t know. I cannot believe that as
    editor of Cycling Weekly and then editor-in-chief of the main cycling
    mags in the UK that I was the only on who had any insight into this – it
    seems incredibly unlikely.””

    Kind of reminds one of the lead up to the war in Iraq.
    And the use of the same “experts” to tell us that war with Iran is iminent.