Washington Post plans ‘modest’ paywall

The Washington Post

The Washington Post will begin charging users “who look at more than 20 articles or multi-media features a month,” Steven Mufson reports.

The step, while modest compared to some other publications, still marks a major change for The Washington Post, which has long shied away from what is known in the business as a paywall for fear of driving away readers and online advertisers.

People who are “familiar with the Post’s online efforts” tell Mufson the company is readying “a new iPad application that it believes will help attract subscribers.”

Previously: Washington Post will ‘probably’ introduce a paywall in 2013, reports the paper | Washington Post polls on paywall as Boston Globe adjusts its meter | Print advertising revenue at Washington Post was down 14% in 2012 | Why The Washington Post should (and should not) introduce a paywall

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • http://twitter.com/worship_dancer Worship Dancer

    wonder how they plan to implement THIS? do they plan to STEAL people’s credit card numbers with a tracking cookie? i won’t enter my own credit card number so how do they plan to charge me?