San Francisco Examiner sues San Francisco Chronicle

SF Weekly | Associated Press

The San Francisco Newspaper Company, which owns the San Francisco Examiner, says the Hearst-owned San Francisco Chronicle “offered ad space to advertisers for a fraction of its cost on the condition that the advertisers not buy ads in the Examiner.”

“The suit also requests financial damages ‘in an amount to be proven at trial,’” Joe Eskenazi reports. “Per the law, that dollar figure could then be tripled.”

Greg Gilchrist, another Examiner attorney, claims the paper can produce material evidence proving the Chronicle not only targeted Examiner advertisers with deep discounts — as low as $1,000 “or even less” for full-page ads listed at between $59,000 and $92,000 on the Chronicle’s advertising rate card — but, on occasion, demanded exclusivity in return for secret and preferential rates.


Section 17043 of California’s Unfair Practices Act says it’s unlawful “to sell any article or product at less than the cost thereof to such vendor, or to give away any article or product, for the purpose of injuring competitors or destroying competition.”

The San Francisco Bay Guardian successfully used this law to win a lawsuit against the SF Weekly, a matter that was finally settled in 2011.

As Eskenazi notes, the Examiner, the Bay Guardian and SF Weekly all now share an owner.

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • abeaujon

    Thanks, Paul, for pointing me toward more precise language.

  • Paul Ashby

    Good thing the Examiner, the Bay Guardian and SF Weekly “all now share the same owner.” If they shared different owners, it’d be, like, weird.