Petitioners ask FCC to block Gannett-Belo deal

Free Press | Variety

Gannett and Belo are trying to get around FCC cross-ownership rules by transferring broadcast licenses to shell companies, Free Press and other groups say in a petition asking the FCC to block the companies’ planned merger.

Gannett announced in June it would buy Belo, making it the fourth-largest owner of major network affiliate stations. The company already owns many newspapers. Investors have cheered the deal.

Time Warner Cable, the American Cable Association and DirecTV have also filed a petition opposing part of the deal, Ted Johnson reports. Those entities say “the deal threatens to drive up retransmission fees and risk even more station blackouts in negotiation standoffs,” Johnson writes.

“These arrangements attempt to mask the true intent and effect of the transaction: to allow Gannett to simultaneously influence and control multiple media outlets in the same local market in a way that is contrary to the public interest and otherwise prohibited by the Commission’s rules,” Free Press’ petition (embedded below) says.


The merger “will lead to job losses and a considerable reduction in the quality of journalism for millions of television homes,” the petition continues.

At the very least, these proposed arrangements are contrary to the spirit of the Commission’s media ownership rules, which are intended to promote diversity, competition, and localism. Even if they do not outright violate the rules, such sharing arrangements are not in the public interest because they reduce the diversity of viewpoints and reduce competition in the provision of local news and the sale of advertising.

“This transaction is entirely consistent with all FCC rules, policies and precedent, and will bring substantial benefits to the public,” Gannett spokesperson Jeremy Gaines writes in an email to Poynter.

Free Press is joined in the petition by several other groups, including the National Hispanic Media Coalition and the Newspaper Guild-CWA.

Free Press’ petition to block Gannett-Belo deal

Related: David Simon says the Kochs shouldn’t buy Tribune

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • James Cieloha

    My idea for trading and swapping assets with other broadcast group so the Gannett/Belo broadcasting group merger could proceed with concessions and conditions I prefer to see with 6 Belo TV stations going to other broadcasting groups with stations from other broadcasting groups going to Gannett that I would like to see them being able to own those stations without any interference and difficulties and in a few cases for both competitive and
    geographical reasons.

    3 way swap with KTVK(regains ABC affiliation) to form a duopoly with KNXV(becomes independent), and WHAS to Scripps, KASW to form a duopoly with KPHO to Meredith, and WNEM to Gannett

    KMSB/KTTU to Tribune for KDAF to form a duopoly with WFAA, KIAH to form a duopoly with KHOU, KFSM/KXNW, WTVR, and WDCW to form a duopoly with WUSA

    KMOV to CBS for WTOG to form a duopoly with WSTP

    From other broadcasting group mergers not related to the Gannett/Belo merger deal:

    Young/Media General as Media General:

    3 way swap with KRON(regains NBC affiliation) to NBC, KNTV(goes independent with KOFY getting MYNET affiliation) to Tribune, and WGHP, and WTVK/WGNT to Media General

    KELO to Meredith for WFSB, and WSHM LD

    KWQC to Quincy for WVVA

    WBAY to Sinclair for WWHO to form a duopoly with WCMH, WTTA to form a duopoly with WFLA, and WGME

    WLAJ to Journal for WFTX

    Tribune/Local TV LLC as Tribune:

    WHNT to LIN for KOIN to form a duopoly with KRCW