Some Buzzfeed reporters were permitted to edit, fix, delete their own articles

Gawker

Some senior Buzzfeed employees were given the option to review their old articles, edit them or delete them in cases where they didn’t live up to the company’s standards, Poynter has learned.

This option, given to some of Buzzfeed’s early employees in the past few months, was part of an effort to make Buzzfeed’s experience more uniform and high-quality across the site and fix or prune some articles that were representative of Buzzfeed’s early origins as a content lab.

Related: Five ways news organizations respond to unpublishing requests

Gawker’s J.K. Trotter wrote about the missing posts Monday, providing links to three posts by senior editor Matt Stopera that had disappeared from Buzzfeed’s main site.

Buzzfeed told Gawker it reviewed posts in light of “our most updated policies and standards” and that “Certain items published no longer met our editorial standards and we want all content our readers see to meet our current policies and practices. We edited some posts, removed certain posts and left other posts as is.”

All three of the removed Buzzfeed articles cited by Gawker, which were published from 2010-2011, are listicles about pop culture. They are:

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Dan Nephin

    I will now be having nightmares about reborn dolls. Thanks, Poynter and Buzzfeed :(

  • yvonnerchandler

    my classmate’s half-sister makes $73 an hour on the
    computer . She has been out of work for seven months but last month her check
    was $19134 just working on the computer for a few hours. navigate to this
    web-site C­a­s­h­f­i­g­.­C­O­M­

  • JTFloore

    regardless of virtually any circumstance, publications should have the good sense NOT to rewrite their own history, which is what this amounts to.