A lengthy correction from The Guardian addresses several errors about Iran’s nuclear program and missiles:

An article went farther than the prime minister when its opening paragraph quoted David Cameron as warning – at a parliamentary committee session – that Iran is seeking to build an “inter-continental nuclear weapon”. The prime minister was indeed talking of suspected Iranian aspirations for a “nuclear-armed future”, but his words about a missile were: “There are signs that the Iranians want to have some sort of intercontinental missile capability.” An ICBM with a nuclear warhead was not mentioned. The piece also reported that Britain’s National Security Council has been looking at possible repercussions if Israel were to launch “a pre-emptive strike against an Iranian nuclear weapons site”. We should have said nuclear site, as Iran is not known to have a site producing nuclear weapons. Finally, our piece said that Iran “is thought to be working with the Koreans to turn an existing missile into a missile that can accommodate a nuclear warhead”. There is evidence that the Iranians and North Koreans cooperated in the past on missile technology; the International Atomic Energy Agency has also asked Iran to explain evidence that it once worked on a missile payload design that could be used to deliver a nuclear warhead. But there is no proof of North Korean involvement in that design, nor is there conclusive proof that Iran has itself pursued the development of such a weapon (Iran seeking ‘intercontinental’ nuclear weapon, says PM, 7 March, page 1).

The Guardian

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.