Will a name change help the St. Pete Times the way it did the South Florida Sun-Sentinel?

The St. Petersburg Times is trading in the name that bears its storied past for a new one targeting the future, Chairman and CEO Paul Tash said in an interview Tuesday.

The decision to become the Tampa Bay Times is a competitive move aimed at taking name space away from cross-town rival The Tampa Tribune, and is raising new speculation about the Media General paper’s viability. The name change has unsettled some;  Twitter reaction decried the lost legacy, weakened identity, and potential confusion.

“I’m honored by any objection here, because it means that the St. Pete Times counts. And I agree — it counts,” said Tash, also chairman of the Poynter Institute, which owns the Times. “But the important part of our name is ‘Times,’ and to make the most of the success that we’ve had and to continue as a first-rate news organization, we need to draw fully on the support of the entire Tampa Bay region.”

It’s not unheard of for newspapers to change their names. A flurry of consolidations and mergers since the 1970s led to many newly hyphenated hybrids. Once in a while a paper will just drop the city from its name, like The Nashville Tennessean in 1970 or The Norwich Bulletin this year.

The Sun-Sentinel (of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) in 2000 expanded its coverage and changed its name to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. That move worked out well, said Earl Maucker, who was the paper’s editor at the time.

Previously the paper was just The Sun-Sentinel, but readers and especially competitors often pigeonholed it as “The Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel,” Maucker told me. Adding a regional title to the name helped the paper in the years that followed.

“Readers began to identify the South Florida Sun-Sentinel as a more regional newspaper that was competitive in the South Florida market with the Miami Herald and the Palm Beach Post,” Maucker said. “Additionally, we got more recognition from our peers outside of South Florida because people could identify where The Sun-Sentinel was geographically located.”

Removing or broadening the geographic label in a newspaper name can help a paper appeal to new advertisers, said Rick Edmonds, media business analyst for The Poynter Institute. He explained that some national ad buyers might assume a paper named the “St. Petersburg Times” doesn’t reach the whole Tampa metro area, but the “Tampa Bay Times” does.

The Tampa-St. Petersburg area (Google Maps image).

The Times is also concerned with audience. It says that three-fourths of its readers currently live outside St. Petersburg. And while long-time residents may know the St. Petersburg Times covers more than just St. Petersburg and Pinellas County, that’s not as obvious to new residents or to some advertisers, Tash said.

“This is a very competitive world, not just between newspapers but among all media,” Tash said. “And so we are trying to appeal as broadly as possible.” Market research showed that people in different parts of the metro area identified with different regional names, he said, but “Tampa Bay” carried strong recognition everywhere.

The name change takes effect Jan. 1. It will cost a “significant” amount of money in the context of any one quarter or even fiscal year, Tash said, but in the long run “it is a bargain that we would be foolish to pass by.” (He did not specify the cost, but said it would not affect other operational spending.)

It remains to be seen whether the existing community that knows the “St. Petersburg” Times will adopt the new name. While it may make business sense, the public doesn’t always follow.

Steve Buttry noted on Twitter Tuesday that when he was at the Des Moines Register (1977-85) it was already known as a statewide paper but didn’t need to change its name to make that point. He also recounted that “years ago the Cedar Rapids Gazette became The Gazette to push regional reach. Everyone still called it Cedar Rapids Gazette.”

I had a similar experience in 2005 when the morning and afternoon newspapers I worked for in Scranton, Penn., The Tribune and The Scranton Times, merged into a single new morning edition called The Times-Tribune.

Dropping “Scranton” from the flag was an attempt to position the paper as a journal of the seven-county coverage area, not just the one city at the center. But over the following five years I worked there, most of the readers, politicians, police officers and newsroom callers continued to refer to it as “The Scranton Times.” After 135 years, habits don’t change overnight.

It’s still too early to know how the Tampa Bay Times will be received, Tash said.

“You never really know until you do it, what the impact is going to be,” he said. “In some ways, the impact depends on how well you do it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.

  • Anonymous

    A name change is not going to save a newspaper. The newspaper medium is the problem, not the newspaper’s name.

    I disagree with the Sun Sentinel editor. The Sun Sentinel is still regarded as a Ft. Lauderdale/Broward newspaper.

    No one in Miami reads the Sun Sentinel. People in Miami and Miami/Dade County still think of the Sentinel as a Broward County newspaper.

    And people in Broward regard the Miami Herald as a Miami newspaper. 

    Putting South Florida in front of their name changed nothing about how the paper is perceived. It was a marketing ploy that didn’t quite work.

    The Sentinel is the paper from South Broward to South Palm Beach County. Everyone who works at the paper knows this.

    The Sentinel has long wanted to crack the Miami market, but they never did. The Herald has long wanted to dominate the Broward market and never did.

    Now, both are dying on the vine and they share their news coverage in order to survive. Their editorial staffs share their news every day. In fact, editors from both papers meet daily to decide on which paper will cover certain stories where they overlap in order to save money and resources.

    So much for the name change in that case.

  • http://twitter.com/stevebuttry Steve Buttry

    Nice piece, Jeff. Thanks for the mention. I should add that in 2005 and 2007 (as I recall; might be off on one of those years), I visited the Sun-Sentinel. At the hotel and elsewhere in town, I heard people referring to it as the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel.

  • Anonymous

    You say: “The Sun-Sentinel (of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) in 2000 expanded its coverage and changed its name to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel.”

    Is the Times planning to expand its Tampa content? If it is, this is a significant move. If not — and it seems unlikely given the recent pay cuts and layoffs at the Times — it’s just decoration. 

    P.S. Poynter regurgitates the Times’ line that “three-fourths of its readers currently live outside St. Petersburg,” which should be expected since Poynter owns the Times. Wouldn’t more apt figures be how many subscribers live in Hillsborough County and how many of them live in Tampa? If this is a competitive move? Just a thought.

  • Anonymous

    The St Pete Times announcement to change their name and rebrand themselves demonstrates how out of touch their leadership is with their readership.

    There is no strength in their arguments. For example, the statement that three-fourths of their readership is outside has been incorrectly interpreted. The St Pete Times should be looking inward as to why their local readership is down. Age and demographics are a few examples, but they need to appeal to the spectrum of ages and interests.

    If the executive staff were to visit a barber shop or Bob Evan’s they would hear why people don’t subscribe to the St Pete Times. The answer is coverage. Their local coverage is horrible. There is little to offer in the arts, high school sports or of interest to the viewers.

    The St Pete Times has avoided hard stories with great intel on the nursing homes. Granted, there is an article here and there, but they have not proven themselves to be a watchdog and protect senior interests. A politico type operation and or weekly or daily segment would be well received.

    The strength of the St Pete Times has always been national and they are very well respected. This has been their emphasis. Now that the Tampa Tribune is floundering they see an opportunity to be regional with the name change. The St Pete Times may increase regional subscribers through attrition, however, this opportunity will not be leveraged because of their poor local coverage. However, this is a rebrand – not a relaunch.

    One point of interest is that it is speculated that a recent bump in local sales was due to coupons – not local coverage…not better coverage!

    Another example is the arts community. The reporters tend to have their favorites and do not hit the streets. It is widely known that requests to the St Pete TImes writers will fall on deaf ears. Locally, editors have not always conducted due diligence on their reporter’s facts. The reporters here have a reputation for leading the reader instead of stating the facts. Locally, we know of one reporter who was not checking facts, nor did the editor. Rumor is that this was handled internally after the fact. Still, this shows a lack of editorial control.

    Their local brand efforts have been abysmal.  If they want to be a regional and national force, then they should focus on local content. Once more, the St Pete Times has ignored the locals. Hence, the term “Chasing Pulitzer” is used to describe how out of touch the St Pete Times is with the region!

    Nationally they are known as the St Pete Times and respected. This rebrand will serve to confuse, not clarify. Locally, the St Pete Times has not stepped up to the plate!

    Their regional argument is poor. Two city metro areas can support a region with two papers. Examples are Dallas/Fort Worth, Minneapolis/St Paul and Oakland/San Francisco. DFW easily supports two papers because each provides strong local coverage.

    Their solution is to rebrand when they should be re-launching their brand name. The funds used to rebrand should be funneled into relaunching their brand. Their executive leadership has sunk them in the bay!

  • Anonymous

    The St Pete Times has proven to me that they are not the smartest marketers on the planet. For example, they could utilize an ad campaign defining Tampa Bay Area as the “Other West Coast. ” This is one way to differentiate San Francisco from Tampa Bay. While this would poke fun at the West Coast. An entire marketing ad campaign could be run around this. We already have lost top companies to the West Coast. We have the talent to compete!

blog comments powered by Disqus