What other approaches could CNN have taken instead of unpublishing hormones story?

CNN’s decision to remove a story about how hormones affect women’s voting decisions raises questions about unpublishing — at CNN and on news sites in general. During a live chat, Poynter’s Kelly McBride talked about the incident and addressed these questions:

  • Should CNN have unpublished the hormone story, and why?
  • What are the ethical implications of unpublishing a story?
  • What are some questions journalists can ask themselves before deciding whether to unpublish?
  • What are some good alternatives to unpublishing?
  • Is it ever OK to unpublish a story, and can you ever really “unring the bell”?

You can replay the chat here:

We have made it easy to comment on posts, however we require civility and encourage full names to that end (first initial, last name is OK). Please read our guidelines here before commenting.